fix(polymarket): reject non-positive research strikes - #94
Conversation
|
@codex review |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 29 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
c605197 to
8e331f9
Compare
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Change contract: Fail closed during governed Polymarket research selection unless every selected price_to_beat is a parseable Decimal strictly greater than zero.
Out of scope: Selection interval limits, raw segment validation, metadata identity rules, normalization, artifact publication, deployment, and live trading behavior.
Dependency or merge order: Corrective follow-up to merged selector PR #93. Rebased onto main at 2ec044c after PRs #91 and #92 merged. Merge this focused fix before opening or merging the normalizer layer.
Focused validation:
Rollout/rollback impact: Research-only fail-closed tightening; malformed zero or negative strikes now stop selection instead of contaminating downstream labels. Rollback is reverting this PR, restoring the prior permissive behavior without changing raw artifacts.
Notes: One file, +55/-1, below the repository split threshold. This PR owns only the missed selector safety counterexample and fix.