Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Update readme - #535
Conversation
cdrage
commented
Jan 26, 2016
- Removes mentions of install for fetch
- New year, new copyright update
- Cleans up some of descriptions
- Remove grammatical errors
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i don't think this should be included ^^. let python devs do their own way of development
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't mind having it. Sometimes I use this and I always come back here as a reference.
cdrage
commented
Feb 8, 2016
cdrage
commented
Feb 9, 2016
Ping @dustymabe@rtnpro for review as this part is old stuff ^^ we don't use |
| Just a call to Docker to package up the application and tag the resulting image. | ||
| Use 'docker build' to package up the application and tags the resulting image. | ||
| ### Install and Run |
dustymabe
commented
Feb 12, 2016
Other than comments it looks good to me. |
cdrage
commented
Feb 16, 2016
@dustymabe updated with your comments. |
| ``` | ||
| ### Build | ||
| ### Build an Atomic App |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we be more clear about what this is doing? "Build an Atomic App" sounds like I am doing an application build (i.e. helloapache) vs packaging up the atomicapp software. Maybe this would be better: Build an Atomic App Container Image - for Container Execution. And then mention running it via Atomic CLI?
And maybe we even want to change the name of the previous section to Install Atomic App - for Local Execution
dustymabe
commented
Feb 19, 2016
@cdrage - can we get this updated? |
cdrage
commented
Feb 22, 2016
Hey @dustymabe In regards to Otherwise, rebased again ^^ |
dustymabe
commented
Feb 23, 2016
What we are doing is containerizing the Atomic App software so it can then be run in a container but it isn't actually an "Atomic App". I say just digest these comments and update it based on your best judgement and then MERGE!! |
cdrage
commented
Feb 23, 2016
@dustymabe So I'm going to push this PR for now and I'll be adding a separate section for "atomic cli" execution this week. Work on doc updating for our upcoming release :) |
surajssd
commented
Feb 23, 2016
I think work on #543 can continue :) |