Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Compatibility with mpl v3.9.2 (latest) - #459
Conversation
|
cannot install: |
@huddao huddao I don't see any errors? |
huddao
commented
Aug 27, 2024
@cvanelteren The version is 'proplot==0.9.5.post425', I'm not sure this is the correct version. |
cvanelteren
commented
Aug 27, 2024
The correct version should be tagged as
|
huddao
commented
Aug 27, 2024
@cvanelteren Thanks! |
austin-hoover
commented
Aug 28, 2024
Working for me! Thank you cvanelteren. |
austin-hoover
commented
Sep 13, 2024
Any update on this? I'm posting analysis code for a paper and it would be great to reference the main proplot branch in the requirements. |
riley-brady
commented
Sep 13, 2024
Nothing that I've seen @austin-hoover. Still waiting on @lukelbd to come in and merge, as he is the only one with permissions. For now you will have to point to @cvanelteren's branch. You can always update your code repo linked to the paper at a later point and point back to a main release here. |
cvanelteren
commented
Sep 30, 2024
Any movement on this @lukelbd? |
austin-hoover
commented
Oct 24, 2024
Also PyPI doesn't allow direct links to GitHub repos, so projects on PyPI can't list working proplot version as a dependency right now. |
I wanted to address the current status of proplot's development. With the recent lack of movement on this project, there's a genuine concern about potentially losing our valuable contributors. To prevent this, I'm proposing we restructure the project under a more collaborative, organization-based framework that would:
Beginning in the new year, I'm prepared to take on a more active leadership role in this initiative. My plan includes forking the repository to maintain development momentum, but I'm committed to keeping communication channels open with @lukelbd and other stakeholders. I'd like to extend an invitation to all interested contributors to join this effort. If you're passionate about proplot's future and want to be part of its continued development, please reach out to discuss how we can collaborate effectively. Together, we can ensure proplot remains a vibrant and well-maintained project that serves its community's needs. |
riley-brady
commented
Nov 7, 2024
Please keep us posted when you fork out and launch the project. My job has severely limited the time I have to directly contribute, but I can continue with scoping as I did here. Might have some opportunities to contribute directly as well. Thanks @cvanelteren and enjoy your well-earned vacation! |
beckermr
commented
Nov 8, 2024
@cvanelteren count me in on helping with dev as I can and I'd like to be a part of the effort. Also, I am cross-referencing the issue currently open on more sustainable development (#452). From the point of view of shipping a fork on conda-forge, it will be by far the easiest if the forked project gets a new name. |
cvanelteren
commented
Nov 8, 2024
Yes I agree @beckermr -- I already have a logo for it ;-). I will be in touch in the new year! |
pratiman-91
commented
Nov 25, 2024
@cvanelteren I am willing to help wherever I can. I like proplot, and it would be nice to see a continuous development along with the latest matplotlib. |
gepcel
commented
Dec 9, 2024
Any updates on this? Now matplolitb 3.9.3 is out. Would be nice to see continuous development along with the latest matplotlib. |
cvanelteren
commented
Dec 12, 2024
See thread above |
gepcel
commented
Dec 12, 2024
Thanks for your reply. I have followed this thread since the very beginning, and I'm eager to hear some updates on the forking repository and maintaining development. Maybe I'm not capable of helping, but I like this package. Any way I'll just wait for the new year. |
jenchen95
commented
Dec 24, 2024
Thank you very much for your contribution, although I regret the single pull request review access, when reviewers are in the middle of a busy work schedule or vacation process, quality contributions like this can go unnoticed, which can wear down the enthusiasm for open source contributions. |
cvanelteren
commented
Dec 25, 2024
Continue discussion here cvanelteren#1 |
cvanelteren
commented
Dec 29, 2024
@gepcel this commit is compatible with mpl 3.9.3 (just tested) Closing this issue for now and everyone is welcome on the forked repo |
cvanelteren
commented
Jan 4, 2025
|
Continuation of #458 and #450. This PR makes it up-to-date with the latest mpl version.
It passes the generate unittests from #458, I will do some finalize testing since the colormaps are the major change in the last couple of mpl versions.