Fix Findings-Table Count Mismatch in TODO.md

[ptr727]

CodeRabbit caught this reviewing #100: the intro said three findings were open at the hub, but the table carries a fourth row, #633, which the row's own text already marks resolved and kept for the record. Reworded the intro to count the resolved entry separately instead of folding it into the open count.

Verified: scripts/prose_lint.py --diff origin/main passes clean.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the hub findings summary to clarify that three findings remain open and one additional finding has been resolved and retained for the record.

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0)📘 Rule violations (0)📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Tip of the day

💡 Did you know, you can switch off images and animations for a plain-text comment

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

[qodo-code-review]

PR Summary by Qodo

Fix TODO.md findings count to separate resolved entry

📝 Documentation🕐 Less than 5 minutes

AI Description

• Clarify TODO.md intro to match the findings table row count.
• Count one resolved finding separately from the three open findings.
• Keep wording consistent with the table’s intent (record vs actionable).

High-Level Assessment

The chosen approach is optimal: adjust the introductory sentence to explicitly distinguish open findings from the resolved record-only entry, aligning narrative text with the table without changing the table structure.

Files changed (1) +1 / -1

Documentation (1) +1 / -1

TODO.mdAlign intro wording with findings table count+1/-1

Align intro wording with findings table count

• Rewords the findings summary sentence to state there are three open findings plus one resolved entry kept for the record. Clarifies that only the three open items drive current audit implications.

TODO.md

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 67e76b6d-afa0-4cbe-9129-136a18d38531

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43108c1 and ef20ed0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• TODO.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 8 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The hub findings paragraph now reports three open findings and one resolved finding retained for historical context.

Changes

Hub findings documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update findings status TODO.md	The findings summary distinguishes three open findings from one resolved finding retained for the record.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to ef20e

This localized documentation change corrects the findings count without affecting product behavior, and no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the main change: fixing the findings-table count mismatch in TODO.md.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix-todo-findings-count

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}