Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README - #243

Merged
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README#243
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom
feature/fix-ci-lint-description

Conversation

@ptr727

@ptr727ptr727 commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The README claimed the PR gate runs "JSON-schema validation", but the workflow only runs jq empty (well-formedness) + spec/validate.py (cross-reference/shape checks) - no schema validation. Corrected to match the actual CI (quantitative-claims rule). Surfaced by the 2.0 promotion review.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@ptr727@claude
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README
1281304
The PR gate does not run JSON-schema validation; it checks JSON well-formedness with jq and runs spec/validate.py (registry/spec cross-reference and shape checks). Correct the README claim to match the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings July 5, 2026 18:09
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates README documentation so it accurately describes what the PR-gate CI validates, aligning the repo's claims with the actual checks performed in .github/workflows/test-pull-request.yml.

Changes:

  • Replaces the README's claim of "JSON-schema validation" with a description of the current JSON validation approach (jq well-formedness + spec/validate.py cross-reference/shape checks).
  • Clarifies the CI gate is lint-only and lists the lint/validation tools involved.

Comment threadREADME.md Outdated
@ptr727@claude
Name all three JSON directories the CI validates in the README
1e58eb8
The jq well-formedness loop covers repo-config/ alongside registry/ and spec/; list all three so the description matches the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727 requested a review from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:13
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@ptr727@claude
Reword the CI JSON validation description to avoid a cspell miss
b60e360
Replace 'well-formedness' (an unknown word to cspell) with plain wording; content unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727 requested a review from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:17
CopilotAI reviewed Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@ptr727
ptr727 merged commit 82789f7 into developJul 5, 2026
7 checks passed
@ptr727
ptr727 deleted the feature/fix-ci-lint-description branch July 5, 2026 18:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ptr727
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README - #243
Merged
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Jul 5, 2026
Merged
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README#243
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Conversation
@ptr727
@ptr727ptr727
commented
Jul 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
The README claimed the PR gate runs "JSON-schema validation", but the workflow only runs jq empty (well-formedness) + spec/validate.py (cross-reference/shape checks) - no schema validation. Corrected to match the actual CI (quantitative-claims rule). Surfaced by the 2.0 promotion review.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@ptr727@claude
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README
1281304
The PR gate does not run JSON-schema validation; it checks JSON well-formedness with jq and runs spec/validate.py (registry/spec cross-reference and shape checks). Correct the README claim to match the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
July 5, 2026 18:09
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Updates README documentation so it accurately describes what the PR-gate CI validates, aligning the repo's claims with the actual checks performed in .github/workflows/test-pull-request.yml.
Changes:
  • Replaces the README's claim of "JSON-schema validation" with a description of the current JSON validation approach (jq well-formedness + spec/validate.py cross-reference/shape checks).
  • Clarifies the CI gate is lint-only and lists the lint/validation tools involved.
Comment threadREADME.md
Outdated

@ptr727@claude
Name all three JSON directories the CI validates in the README
1e58eb8
The jq well-formedness loop covers repo-config/ alongside registry/ and spec/; list all three so the description matches the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:13
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727@claude
Reword the CI JSON validation description to avoid a cspell miss
b60e360
Replace 'well-formedness' (an unknown word to cspell) with plain wording; content unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:17
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727
ptr727
merged commit 82789f7
into
developJul 5, 2026

7 checks passed

@ptr727
ptr727
deleted the

feature/fix-ci-lint-description

branch
July 5, 2026 18:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ptr727

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README - #243
Merged
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Jul 5, 2026
Merged
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README#243
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Conversation
@ptr727
@ptr727ptr727
commented
Jul 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
The README claimed the PR gate runs "JSON-schema validation", but the workflow only runs jq empty (well-formedness) + spec/validate.py (cross-reference/shape checks) - no schema validation. Corrected to match the actual CI (quantitative-claims rule). Surfaced by the 2.0 promotion review.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@ptr727@claude
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README
1281304
The PR gate does not run JSON-schema validation; it checks JSON well-formedness with jq and runs spec/validate.py (registry/spec cross-reference and shape checks). Correct the README claim to match the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
July 5, 2026 18:09
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Updates README documentation so it accurately describes what the PR-gate CI validates, aligning the repo's claims with the actual checks performed in .github/workflows/test-pull-request.yml.
Changes:
  • Replaces the README's claim of "JSON-schema validation" with a description of the current JSON validation approach (jq well-formedness + spec/validate.py cross-reference/shape checks).
  • Clarifies the CI gate is lint-only and lists the lint/validation tools involved.
Comment threadREADME.md
Outdated

@ptr727@claude
Name all three JSON directories the CI validates in the README
1e58eb8
The jq well-formedness loop covers repo-config/ alongside registry/ and spec/; list all three so the description matches the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:13
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727@claude
Reword the CI JSON validation description to avoid a cspell miss
b60e360
Replace 'well-formedness' (an unknown word to cspell) with plain wording; content unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:17
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727
ptr727
merged commit 82789f7
into
developJul 5, 2026

7 checks passed

@ptr727
ptr727
deleted the

feature/fix-ci-lint-description

branch
July 5, 2026 18:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ptr727

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README - #243
Merged
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Jul 5, 2026
Merged
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README#243
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Conversation
@ptr727
@ptr727ptr727
commented
Jul 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
The README claimed the PR gate runs "JSON-schema validation", but the workflow only runs jq empty (well-formedness) + spec/validate.py (cross-reference/shape checks) - no schema validation. Corrected to match the actual CI (quantitative-claims rule). Surfaced by the 2.0 promotion review.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@ptr727@claude
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README
1281304
The PR gate does not run JSON-schema validation; it checks JSON well-formedness with jq and runs spec/validate.py (registry/spec cross-reference and shape checks). Correct the README claim to match the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
July 5, 2026 18:09
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Updates README documentation so it accurately describes what the PR-gate CI validates, aligning the repo's claims with the actual checks performed in .github/workflows/test-pull-request.yml.
Changes:
  • Replaces the README's claim of "JSON-schema validation" with a description of the current JSON validation approach (jq well-formedness + spec/validate.py cross-reference/shape checks).
  • Clarifies the CI gate is lint-only and lists the lint/validation tools involved.
Comment threadREADME.md
Outdated

@ptr727@claude
Name all three JSON directories the CI validates in the README
1e58eb8
The jq well-formedness loop covers repo-config/ alongside registry/ and spec/; list all three so the description matches the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:13
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727@claude
Reword the CI JSON validation description to avoid a cspell miss
b60e360
Replace 'well-formedness' (an unknown word to cspell) with plain wording; content unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:17
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727
ptr727
merged commit 82789f7
into
developJul 5, 2026

7 checks passed

@ptr727
ptr727
deleted the

feature/fix-ci-lint-description

branch
July 5, 2026 18:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ptr727

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README - #243
Merged
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Jul 5, 2026
Merged
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README#243
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Conversation
@ptr727
@ptr727ptr727
commented
Jul 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
The README claimed the PR gate runs "JSON-schema validation", but the workflow only runs jq empty (well-formedness) + spec/validate.py (cross-reference/shape checks) - no schema validation. Corrected to match the actual CI (quantitative-claims rule). Surfaced by the 2.0 promotion review.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@ptr727@claude
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README
1281304
The PR gate does not run JSON-schema validation; it checks JSON well-formedness with jq and runs spec/validate.py (registry/spec cross-reference and shape checks). Correct the README claim to match the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
July 5, 2026 18:09
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Updates README documentation so it accurately describes what the PR-gate CI validates, aligning the repo's claims with the actual checks performed in .github/workflows/test-pull-request.yml.
Changes:
  • Replaces the README's claim of "JSON-schema validation" with a description of the current JSON validation approach (jq well-formedness + spec/validate.py cross-reference/shape checks).
  • Clarifies the CI gate is lint-only and lists the lint/validation tools involved.
Comment threadREADME.md
Outdated

@ptr727@claude
Name all three JSON directories the CI validates in the README
1e58eb8
The jq well-formedness loop covers repo-config/ alongside registry/ and spec/; list all three so the description matches the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:13
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727@claude
Reword the CI JSON validation description to avoid a cspell miss
b60e360
Replace 'well-formedness' (an unknown word to cspell) with plain wording; content unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:17
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727
ptr727
merged commit 82789f7
into
developJul 5, 2026

7 checks passed

@ptr727
ptr727
deleted the

feature/fix-ci-lint-description

branch
July 5, 2026 18:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ptr727

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README - #243
Merged
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Jul 5, 2026
Merged
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README#243
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Conversation
@ptr727
@ptr727ptr727
commented
Jul 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
The README claimed the PR gate runs "JSON-schema validation", but the workflow only runs jq empty (well-formedness) + spec/validate.py (cross-reference/shape checks) - no schema validation. Corrected to match the actual CI (quantitative-claims rule). Surfaced by the 2.0 promotion review.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@ptr727@claude
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README
1281304
The PR gate does not run JSON-schema validation; it checks JSON well-formedness with jq and runs spec/validate.py (registry/spec cross-reference and shape checks). Correct the README claim to match the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
July 5, 2026 18:09
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Updates README documentation so it accurately describes what the PR-gate CI validates, aligning the repo's claims with the actual checks performed in .github/workflows/test-pull-request.yml.
Changes:
  • Replaces the README's claim of "JSON-schema validation" with a description of the current JSON validation approach (jq well-formedness + spec/validate.py cross-reference/shape checks).
  • Clarifies the CI gate is lint-only and lists the lint/validation tools involved.
Comment threadREADME.md
Outdated

@ptr727@claude
Name all three JSON directories the CI validates in the README
1e58eb8
The jq well-formedness loop covers repo-config/ alongside registry/ and spec/; list all three so the description matches the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:13
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727@claude
Reword the CI JSON validation description to avoid a cspell miss
b60e360
Replace 'well-formedness' (an unknown word to cspell) with plain wording; content unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:17
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727
ptr727
merged commit 82789f7
into
developJul 5, 2026

7 checks passed

@ptr727
ptr727
deleted the

feature/fix-ci-lint-description

branch
July 5, 2026 18:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ptr727

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README - #243
Merged
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Jul 5, 2026
Merged
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README#243
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Conversation
@ptr727
@ptr727ptr727
commented
Jul 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
The README claimed the PR gate runs "JSON-schema validation", but the workflow only runs jq empty (well-formedness) + spec/validate.py (cross-reference/shape checks) - no schema validation. Corrected to match the actual CI (quantitative-claims rule). Surfaced by the 2.0 promotion review.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@ptr727@claude
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README
1281304
The PR gate does not run JSON-schema validation; it checks JSON well-formedness with jq and runs spec/validate.py (registry/spec cross-reference and shape checks). Correct the README claim to match the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
July 5, 2026 18:09
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Updates README documentation so it accurately describes what the PR-gate CI validates, aligning the repo's claims with the actual checks performed in .github/workflows/test-pull-request.yml.
Changes:
  • Replaces the README's claim of "JSON-schema validation" with a description of the current JSON validation approach (jq well-formedness + spec/validate.py cross-reference/shape checks).
  • Clarifies the CI gate is lint-only and lists the lint/validation tools involved.
Comment threadREADME.md
Outdated

@ptr727@claude
Name all three JSON directories the CI validates in the README
1e58eb8
The jq well-formedness loop covers repo-config/ alongside registry/ and spec/; list all three so the description matches the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:13
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727@claude
Reword the CI JSON validation description to avoid a cspell miss
b60e360
Replace 'well-formedness' (an unknown word to cspell) with plain wording; content unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:17
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727
ptr727
merged commit 82789f7
into
developJul 5, 2026

7 checks passed

@ptr727
ptr727
deleted the

feature/fix-ci-lint-description

branch
July 5, 2026 18:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ptr727

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README - #243
Merged
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Jul 5, 2026
Merged
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README#243
ptr727 merged 3 commits into
developfrom 
feature/fix-ci-lint-description
Conversation
@ptr727
@ptr727ptr727
commented
Jul 5, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
The README claimed the PR gate runs "JSON-schema validation", but the workflow only runs jq empty (well-formedness) + spec/validate.py (cross-reference/shape checks) - no schema validation. Corrected to match the actual CI (quantitative-claims rule). Surfaced by the 2.0 promotion review.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
@ptr727@claude
Describe the CI JSON validation accurately in the README
1281304
The PR gate does not run JSON-schema validation; it checks JSON well-formedness with jq and runs spec/validate.py (registry/spec cross-reference and shape checks). Correct the README claim to match the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
July 5, 2026 18:09
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Updates README documentation so it accurately describes what the PR-gate CI validates, aligning the repo's claims with the actual checks performed in .github/workflows/test-pull-request.yml.
Changes:
  • Replaces the README's claim of "JSON-schema validation" with a description of the current JSON validation approach (jq well-formedness + spec/validate.py cross-reference/shape checks).
  • Clarifies the CI gate is lint-only and lists the lint/validation tools involved.
Comment threadREADME.md
Outdated

@ptr727@claude
Name all three JSON directories the CI validates in the README
1e58eb8
The jq well-formedness loop covers repo-config/ alongside registry/ and spec/; list all three so the description matches the workflow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:13
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727@claude
Reword the CI JSON validation description to avoid a cspell miss
b60e360
Replace 'well-formedness' (an unknown word to cspell) with plain wording; content unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727
requested a review
from CopilotJuly 5, 2026 18:17
CopilotAI
reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
@ptr727
ptr727
merged commit 82789f7
into
developJul 5, 2026

7 checks passed

@ptr727
ptr727
deleted the

feature/fix-ci-lint-description

branch
July 5, 2026 18:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ptr727