Skip to content

Manually applying two clang-format changes that need fix-ups for clang-tidy. - #3705

Merged
rwgk merged 1 commit into
pybind:masterfrom
rwgk:clang-format_clang-tidy_compatibility
Feb 9, 2022
Merged

Manually applying two clang-format changes that need fix-ups for clang-tidy.#3705
rwgk merged 1 commit into
pybind:masterfrom
rwgk:clang-format_clang-tidy_compatibility

Conversation

@rwgk

@rwgkrwgk commented Feb 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

Preparation for full clang-formating, informed by work under PRs #3683 and #3703.

With these manual "forward ports" of clang-format changes + manual fix-ups for clang-tidy compatibility, a full clang-format run builds out of the box.

Suggested changelog entry:

@rwgk
rwgk marked this pull request as ready for review February 9, 2022 14:21
@rwgk

rwgk commented Feb 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Oops, sorry I forgot to mark this as read for review before.

@rwgk

rwgk commented Feb 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

This is such a tiny whitespace thing, I'll merge it now, so that I have a clean baseline for working on the comments, following the plan under #3703 (comment).

@rwgk
rwgk merged commit abc3869 into pybind:masterFeb 9, 2022
@rwgk
rwgk deleted the clang-format_clang-tidy_compatibility branch February 9, 2022 14:32
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the needs changelog Possibly needs a changelog entry label Feb 9, 2022
@rwgkrwgk removed the needs changelog Possibly needs a changelog entry label Feb 9, 2022
@rwgkrwgk mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@rwgk