Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Make argmin/max work lazy with dask - #3244
Conversation
max-sixty
commented
Aug 22, 2019
This looks good @ulijh ! Thanks Could you add a test? Also feel free to give yourself credit in a whatsnew |
ulijh
commented
Aug 22, 2019
Thanks @max-sixty! Sure, I'll do this tomorrow then. |
Guys, if you could have a look at the tests I modified (a4c3622) to check how many times things get computed. I tried to integrate it with the existing tests. The number of count check could possibly be applied to some other tests as well. May be there is a smarter way of doing this? |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-Authored-By: Stephan Hoyer <shoyer@gmail.com>
ulijh
commented
Aug 27, 2019
May be this is a stupid question: What's the best way to resolve this conflict, and get the checks to run? Should I do a merge master? Or rebase (seems somewhat of a pain to get the remote up to date)? Thanks for the advice! |
dcherian
commented
Aug 27, 2019
Merge master is enough. I just did it to kick off the tests. |
shoyer
commented
Aug 27, 2019
via email
We recommend using "merge master". It looks like our contributor guidelines
need to be updated here so don't hesitate to ask any questions. …On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:53 AM ulijh ***@***.***> wrote:
May be this is a stupid question: What's the best way to resolve this
conflict, and get the checks to run? Should I do a merge master? Or rebase
(seems somewhat of a pain to get the remote up to date)? Thanks for the
advice!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3244?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAJJFVQAAE3MFYV7TYISC5LQGVEY3A5CNFSM4IOZF562YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5IHB2I#issuecomment-525365481>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJJFVVE2BSI2T76X6CAHC3QGVEY3ANCNFSM4IOZF56Q>
.
|
ulijh
commented
Aug 27, 2019
Thanks guys! |
* master: Fix whats-new date :/ Revert to dev version Release v0.13.0 auto_combine deprecation to 0.14 (pydata#3314) Deprecation: groupby, resample default dim. (pydata#3313) Raise error if cmap is list of colors (pydata#3310) Refactor concat to use merge for non-concatenated variables (pydata#3239) Honor `keep_attrs` in DataArray.quantile (pydata#3305) Fix DataArray api doc (pydata#3309) Accept int value in head, thin and tail (pydata#3298) ignore h5py 2.10.0 warnings and fix invalid_netcdf warning test. (pydata#3301) Update why-xarray.rst with clearer expression (pydata#3307) Compat and encoding deprecation to 0.14 (pydata#3294) Remove deprecated concat kwargs. (pydata#3288) allow np-array levels and colors in 2D plots (pydata#3295) Remove some deprecations (pydata#3292) Make argmin/max work lazy with dask (pydata#3244) Add head, tail and thin methods (pydata#3278) Updater to testing environment name (pydata#3253)
As @shoyer pointed out in #3237, nanargmax/min from numpy or dask should be used when not working on object arrays. Also, nanargmin/max were added to the nputils module so they should be using bottleneck if available.
argmax()causes dask to compute #3237black . && mypy . && flake8whats-new.rstfor all changes andapi.rstfor new API