[Feature] Nested executor - #1030

Draft
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor
Draft

[Feature] Nested executor#1030
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor

Conversation

@jan-janssen

@jan-janssenjan-janssen commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Allow using the executor inside a submitted function

Example

importexecutorlibdefecho(i):
returnidefnested_echo(i, executorlib_executor):
future_obj=executorlib_executor.submit(echo, i)
returnfuture_objwithexecutorlib.SingleNodeExecutor() asexe:
future_obj=exe.submit(nested_echo, 4)
print(future_obj.result())

Current challenges

  • The example code hangs, so something is wrong with the implementation.
  • At the moment the user is not allowed to set the executor, but simply has to name the variable executorlib_executor and keep it empty, which is not very intuitive.
  • It is unclear how to access the output of the nested functions, as the user does not have access to the corresponding future objects.
  • Dependencies for nested functions does not work.
  • The resolving of nested functions is not possible when disable_dependencies=False but no error message is raised.

Summary

It is primarily a concept and not something which is going to be available any time soon.

@jan-janssen
jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2026 17:08
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 88bd6194-ab3b-4949-bd13-f329cc81678d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch nested_executor

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 73.43750% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (99542eb) to head (0f47e8f).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/executorlib/backend/executor_nested.py61.90%8 Missing ⚠️
src/executorlib/backend/interactive_parallel.py0.00%4 Missing ⚠️
...ecutorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py62.50%3 Missing ⚠️
...rlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
...executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1030 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.19% 93.65% -0.55% 
==========================================
Files 39 40 +1 Lines 2137 2190 +53 ==========================================
+ Hits 2013 2051 +38 - Misses 124 139 +15 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jan-janssen@pyiron-runner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[Feature] Nested executor - #1030

Draft
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor
Draft

[Feature] Nested executor#1030
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor

Conversation

@jan-janssen

@jan-janssenjan-janssen commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Allow using the executor inside a submitted function

Example

importexecutorlibdefecho(i):
returnidefnested_echo(i, executorlib_executor):
future_obj=executorlib_executor.submit(echo, i)
returnfuture_objwithexecutorlib.SingleNodeExecutor() asexe:
future_obj=exe.submit(nested_echo, 4)
print(future_obj.result())

Current challenges

  • The example code hangs, so something is wrong with the implementation.
  • At the moment the user is not allowed to set the executor, but simply has to name the variable executorlib_executor and keep it empty, which is not very intuitive.
  • It is unclear how to access the output of the nested functions, as the user does not have access to the corresponding future objects.
  • Dependencies for nested functions does not work.
  • The resolving of nested functions is not possible when disable_dependencies=False but no error message is raised.

Summary

It is primarily a concept and not something which is going to be available any time soon.

@jan-janssen
jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2026 17:08
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 88bd6194-ab3b-4949-bd13-f329cc81678d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch nested_executor

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 73.43750% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (99542eb) to head (0f47e8f).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/executorlib/backend/executor_nested.py61.90%8 Missing ⚠️
src/executorlib/backend/interactive_parallel.py0.00%4 Missing ⚠️
...ecutorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py62.50%3 Missing ⚠️
...rlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
...executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1030 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.19% 93.65% -0.55% 
==========================================
Files 39 40 +1 Lines 2137 2190 +53 ==========================================
+ Hits 2013 2051 +38 - Misses 124 139 +15 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jan-janssen@pyiron-runner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[Feature] Nested executor - #1030

Draft
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor
Draft

[Feature] Nested executor#1030
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor

Conversation

@jan-janssen

@jan-janssenjan-janssen commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Allow using the executor inside a submitted function

Example

importexecutorlibdefecho(i):
returnidefnested_echo(i, executorlib_executor):
future_obj=executorlib_executor.submit(echo, i)
returnfuture_objwithexecutorlib.SingleNodeExecutor() asexe:
future_obj=exe.submit(nested_echo, 4)
print(future_obj.result())

Current challenges

  • The example code hangs, so something is wrong with the implementation.
  • At the moment the user is not allowed to set the executor, but simply has to name the variable executorlib_executor and keep it empty, which is not very intuitive.
  • It is unclear how to access the output of the nested functions, as the user does not have access to the corresponding future objects.
  • Dependencies for nested functions does not work.
  • The resolving of nested functions is not possible when disable_dependencies=False but no error message is raised.

Summary

It is primarily a concept and not something which is going to be available any time soon.

@jan-janssen
jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2026 17:08
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 88bd6194-ab3b-4949-bd13-f329cc81678d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch nested_executor

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 73.43750% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (99542eb) to head (0f47e8f).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/executorlib/backend/executor_nested.py61.90%8 Missing ⚠️
src/executorlib/backend/interactive_parallel.py0.00%4 Missing ⚠️
...ecutorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py62.50%3 Missing ⚠️
...rlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
...executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1030 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.19% 93.65% -0.55% 
==========================================
Files 39 40 +1 Lines 2137 2190 +53 ==========================================
+ Hits 2013 2051 +38 - Misses 124 139 +15 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jan-janssen@pyiron-runner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[Feature] Nested executor - #1030

Draft
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor
Draft

[Feature] Nested executor#1030
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor

Conversation

@jan-janssen

@jan-janssenjan-janssen commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Allow using the executor inside a submitted function

Example

importexecutorlibdefecho(i):
returnidefnested_echo(i, executorlib_executor):
future_obj=executorlib_executor.submit(echo, i)
returnfuture_objwithexecutorlib.SingleNodeExecutor() asexe:
future_obj=exe.submit(nested_echo, 4)
print(future_obj.result())

Current challenges

  • The example code hangs, so something is wrong with the implementation.
  • At the moment the user is not allowed to set the executor, but simply has to name the variable executorlib_executor and keep it empty, which is not very intuitive.
  • It is unclear how to access the output of the nested functions, as the user does not have access to the corresponding future objects.
  • Dependencies for nested functions does not work.
  • The resolving of nested functions is not possible when disable_dependencies=False but no error message is raised.

Summary

It is primarily a concept and not something which is going to be available any time soon.

@jan-janssen
jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2026 17:08
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 88bd6194-ab3b-4949-bd13-f329cc81678d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch nested_executor

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 73.43750% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (99542eb) to head (0f47e8f).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/executorlib/backend/executor_nested.py61.90%8 Missing ⚠️
src/executorlib/backend/interactive_parallel.py0.00%4 Missing ⚠️
...ecutorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py62.50%3 Missing ⚠️
...rlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
...executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1030 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.19% 93.65% -0.55% 
==========================================
Files 39 40 +1 Lines 2137 2190 +53 ==========================================
+ Hits 2013 2051 +38 - Misses 124 139 +15 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jan-janssen@pyiron-runner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[Feature] Nested executor - #1030

Draft
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor
Draft

[Feature] Nested executor#1030
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor

Conversation

@jan-janssen

@jan-janssenjan-janssen commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Allow using the executor inside a submitted function

Example

importexecutorlibdefecho(i):
returnidefnested_echo(i, executorlib_executor):
future_obj=executorlib_executor.submit(echo, i)
returnfuture_objwithexecutorlib.SingleNodeExecutor() asexe:
future_obj=exe.submit(nested_echo, 4)
print(future_obj.result())

Current challenges

  • The example code hangs, so something is wrong with the implementation.
  • At the moment the user is not allowed to set the executor, but simply has to name the variable executorlib_executor and keep it empty, which is not very intuitive.
  • It is unclear how to access the output of the nested functions, as the user does not have access to the corresponding future objects.
  • Dependencies for nested functions does not work.
  • The resolving of nested functions is not possible when disable_dependencies=False but no error message is raised.

Summary

It is primarily a concept and not something which is going to be available any time soon.

@jan-janssen
jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2026 17:08
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 88bd6194-ab3b-4949-bd13-f329cc81678d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch nested_executor

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 73.43750% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (99542eb) to head (0f47e8f).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/executorlib/backend/executor_nested.py61.90%8 Missing ⚠️
src/executorlib/backend/interactive_parallel.py0.00%4 Missing ⚠️
...ecutorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py62.50%3 Missing ⚠️
...rlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
...executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1030 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.19% 93.65% -0.55% 
==========================================
Files 39 40 +1 Lines 2137 2190 +53 ==========================================
+ Hits 2013 2051 +38 - Misses 124 139 +15 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jan-janssen@pyiron-runner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[Feature] Nested executor - #1030

Draft
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor
Draft

[Feature] Nested executor#1030
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor

Conversation

@jan-janssen

@jan-janssenjan-janssen commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Allow using the executor inside a submitted function

Example

importexecutorlibdefecho(i):
returnidefnested_echo(i, executorlib_executor):
future_obj=executorlib_executor.submit(echo, i)
returnfuture_objwithexecutorlib.SingleNodeExecutor() asexe:
future_obj=exe.submit(nested_echo, 4)
print(future_obj.result())

Current challenges

  • The example code hangs, so something is wrong with the implementation.
  • At the moment the user is not allowed to set the executor, but simply has to name the variable executorlib_executor and keep it empty, which is not very intuitive.
  • It is unclear how to access the output of the nested functions, as the user does not have access to the corresponding future objects.
  • Dependencies for nested functions does not work.
  • The resolving of nested functions is not possible when disable_dependencies=False but no error message is raised.

Summary

It is primarily a concept and not something which is going to be available any time soon.

@jan-janssen
jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2026 17:08
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 88bd6194-ab3b-4949-bd13-f329cc81678d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch nested_executor

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 73.43750% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (99542eb) to head (0f47e8f).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/executorlib/backend/executor_nested.py61.90%8 Missing ⚠️
src/executorlib/backend/interactive_parallel.py0.00%4 Missing ⚠️
...ecutorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py62.50%3 Missing ⚠️
...rlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
...executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1030 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.19% 93.65% -0.55% 
==========================================
Files 39 40 +1 Lines 2137 2190 +53 ==========================================
+ Hits 2013 2051 +38 - Misses 124 139 +15 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jan-janssen@pyiron-runner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[Feature] Nested executor - #1030

Draft
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor
Draft

[Feature] Nested executor#1030
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor

Conversation

@jan-janssen

@jan-janssenjan-janssen commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Allow using the executor inside a submitted function

Example

importexecutorlibdefecho(i):
returnidefnested_echo(i, executorlib_executor):
future_obj=executorlib_executor.submit(echo, i)
returnfuture_objwithexecutorlib.SingleNodeExecutor() asexe:
future_obj=exe.submit(nested_echo, 4)
print(future_obj.result())

Current challenges

  • The example code hangs, so something is wrong with the implementation.
  • At the moment the user is not allowed to set the executor, but simply has to name the variable executorlib_executor and keep it empty, which is not very intuitive.
  • It is unclear how to access the output of the nested functions, as the user does not have access to the corresponding future objects.
  • Dependencies for nested functions does not work.
  • The resolving of nested functions is not possible when disable_dependencies=False but no error message is raised.

Summary

It is primarily a concept and not something which is going to be available any time soon.

@jan-janssen
jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2026 17:08
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 88bd6194-ab3b-4949-bd13-f329cc81678d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch nested_executor

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 73.43750% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (99542eb) to head (0f47e8f).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/executorlib/backend/executor_nested.py61.90%8 Missing ⚠️
src/executorlib/backend/interactive_parallel.py0.00%4 Missing ⚠️
...ecutorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py62.50%3 Missing ⚠️
...rlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
...executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1030 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.19% 93.65% -0.55% 
==========================================
Files 39 40 +1 Lines 2137 2190 +53 ==========================================
+ Hits 2013 2051 +38 - Misses 124 139 +15 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jan-janssen@pyiron-runner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[Feature] Nested executor - #1030

Draft
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor
Draft

[Feature] Nested executor#1030
jan-janssen wants to merge 17 commits into
mainfrom
nested_executor

Conversation

@jan-janssen

@jan-janssenjan-janssen commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Allow using the executor inside a submitted function

Example

importexecutorlibdefecho(i):
returnidefnested_echo(i, executorlib_executor):
future_obj=executorlib_executor.submit(echo, i)
returnfuture_objwithexecutorlib.SingleNodeExecutor() asexe:
future_obj=exe.submit(nested_echo, 4)
print(future_obj.result())

Current challenges

  • The example code hangs, so something is wrong with the implementation.
  • At the moment the user is not allowed to set the executor, but simply has to name the variable executorlib_executor and keep it empty, which is not very intuitive.
  • It is unclear how to access the output of the nested functions, as the user does not have access to the corresponding future objects.
  • Dependencies for nested functions does not work.
  • The resolving of nested functions is not possible when disable_dependencies=False but no error message is raised.

Summary

It is primarily a concept and not something which is going to be available any time soon.

@jan-janssen
jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2026 17:08
@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 88bd6194-ab3b-4949-bd13-f329cc81678d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch nested_executor

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 73.43750% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (99542eb) to head (0f47e8f).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/executorlib/backend/executor_nested.py61.90%8 Missing ⚠️
src/executorlib/backend/interactive_parallel.py0.00%4 Missing ⚠️
...ecutorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/dependency.py62.50%3 Missing ⚠️
...rlib/task_scheduler/interactive/blockallocation.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
...executorlib/task_scheduler/interactive/onetoone.py75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1030 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.19% 93.65% -0.55% 
==========================================
Files 39 40 +1 Lines 2137 2190 +53 ==========================================
+ Hits 2013 2051 +38 - Misses 124 139 +15 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jan-janssen@pyiron-runner