Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Parameter naming inconsistency detected across codebase
The verification reveals inconsistent parameter naming between the docstring and actual implementation:
cores,threads_per_core, andgpus_per_corecores_per_workerandgpus_per_workerin multiple files:executorlib/standalone/inputcheck.pyexecutorlib/interactive/executor.pyexecutorlib/standalone/serialize.pytests/test_shared_input_check.pyThis inconsistency needs to be addressed to maintain code clarity and prevent potential bugs.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify complete parameter renaming across codebase
Let's ensure there are no remaining occurrences of the old parameter names to maintain consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 14477