Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Explain Contributions and Support - #616
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
WalkthroughThis pull request updates the documentation by renaming the "Developer" section to "Support & Contribution" in both the README.md file and the notebooks/4-developer.ipynb notebook. The changes add new sub-items for "Issues" and "Pull Requests" while retaining the existing "Communication" and "External Executables" entries. The revised texts now provide clearer guidance on reporting issues and submitting pull requests within the documentation. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File ( |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #616 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.40% 96.40% =======================================
Files 28 28 Lines 1252 1252 =======================================
Hits 1207 1207 Misses 45 45 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
notebooks/4-developer.ipynb (1)
1-1: Consider adding a Contributing Guidelines fileWhile the current documentation is good, consider also creating a separate CONTRIBUTING.md file in the repository root that contains these guidelines, as this is a common practice that makes contribution information more discoverable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.md(1 hunks)notebooks/4-developer.ipynb(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: unittest_win
- GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
- GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
- GitHub Check: notebooks
🔇 Additional comments (6)
notebooks/4-developer.ipynb (3)
1-1: Great job enhancing the documentation structure and clarity!The change from "Developer" to "Support and Contribution" makes the project more welcoming to external contributors. The comprehensive sections on Issues and Pull Requests provide clear guidance for potential contributors.
1-1: Well-structured content with appropriate subsectionsThe new organization with dedicated sections for Issues and Pull Requests follows best practices for open-source project documentation, making it easier for new contributors to understand how they can participate.
1-1: Helpful guidance for issue reportingThe Issues section provides valuable guidance on creating reproducible test cases and offers a clear benchmark (compatibility with ProcessPoolExecutor/ThreadPoolExecutor) for determining when an issue is worth reporting.
README.md (3)
149-155: Excellent alignment with notebook documentationThe README changes correctly reflect the renamed section and structure in the notebooks/4-developer.ipynb file, maintaining consistency across documentation sources.
149-151: Good addition of new subsectionsAdding dedicated links for Issues and Pull Requests makes these important contribution pathways more discoverable for new contributors.
154-155: Appropriate preservation of technical documentationGood decision to maintain the existing technical sections (Communication and External Executables) while reorganizing them under the new "Support & Contribution" heading.
Summary by CodeRabbit