121 augmentor implementation

[mickp]

Needs testing with hardware

An alternative implementation for #121, replacing #124.

The camera is augmented with methods to do data processing and return the correct image shape depending on processing mode. Camera parameters are passed as a dict, to avoid the dot-notation problem discussed in #124.

[mickp]

@NickHallONBI - can you test this with the hardware when you get a chance?

[iandobbie]

Testing today on the cryo Aurox setup appears to work.

One problem is the docstring..

Config sample:
device(microscope.filterwheels.aurox.Clarity,
{'camera': 'microscope.Cameras.cameramodule.SomeCamera',
'camera.someSetting': value})

The camera module is a python object not a string so shouldn't be in quotes.

[carandraug]

I started looking into this and merge into master but then noticed that while we import ClarityProcessor we then call clarity_process.ClarityProcessor. So has this actually been tested? What really have people been running?

[iandobbie]

Exactly my question. We should merge what works and close the other issues.

[mickp]

Do you still need this changes, or should I close this PR?

[iandobbie]

This is unfortunate as we don't currently have access to a system to test this on. I would say pull this change as it likely fixes real issues on the aurox.