Bug report
Bug description:
There are several cases, where ob_digit[0] of PyLongObject will not be initialized before evaluation.
I fixed that issue in Python 3.11.8 with this patch - it also concerns Python 3.11.9:
---longobject.c_orig2024-02-0622:21:21.000000000+0100+++longobject.c2024-05-1317:47:25.846011498+0200
@@ -165,6+165,7 @@
returnNULL;
}
_PyObject_InitVar((PyVarObject*)result, &PyLong_Type, size);
+result->ob_digit[0] =0;
returnresult;
}
For example, one case is in longobject.c:922 in _PyLong_FromByteArray() if numsignificantbytes==0.
First, I fixed it locally in _PyLong_FromByteArray() but than I found similar cases in other functions.
Therefore, I decided to initialize ob_digit[0] right in _PyLong_New() in order to catch all situations.
Kind regards,
Ove
CPython versions tested on:
3.11
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Bug report
Bug description:
There are several cases, where ob_digit[0] of PyLongObject will not be initialized before evaluation.
I fixed that issue in Python 3.11.8 with this patch - it also concerns Python 3.11.9:
For example, one case is in longobject.c:922 in _PyLong_FromByteArray() if numsignificantbytes==0.
First, I fixed it locally in _PyLong_FromByteArray() but than I found similar cases in other functions.
Therefore, I decided to initialize ob_digit[0] right in _PyLong_New() in order to catch all situations.
Kind regards,
Ove
CPython versions tested on:
3.11
Operating systems tested on:
Linux