Bug report
Bug description:
This is a sub-issue for #146102 and more details can be found here.
In code_richcompare on line 2608, PyObject_RichCompareBool can return an error (-1), but that is treated incorrectly since !(-1) == 0 . Reproducer:
classBadStr(str):
_armed=Falsedef__eq__(self, other):
ifBadStr._armedandisinstance(other, str) andstr.__eq__(self, other):
raiseRuntimeError("Poison!")
returnstr.__eq__(self, other)
def__hash__(self): returnstr.__hash__(self)
c1=compile("pass", "test", "exec")
c2=c1.replace(co_name=BadStr("poison"))
c3=compile("pass", "poison", "exec")
BadStr._armed=Truec2==c3# assertion: !_PyErr_Occurred(tstate)CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
Bug report
Bug description:
This is a sub-issue for #146102 and more details can be found here.
In
code_richcompareon line 2608,PyObject_RichCompareBoolcan return an error (-1), but that is treated incorrectly since!(-1) == 0. Reproducer:CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
code_richcomparewhenPyObject_RichCompareBoolfails #146200