Skip to content

ast.parse creates only Constant(value=0) nodes for a case +0: pattern, which is inconsistent. #152708

Description

@15r10nk

Bug report

Bug description:

I found the following asymmetry in the generated ast while I was working with the new cpython 3.15.

c="""match 0: case +0: pass case -0: pass+0-0"""importastprint(ast.dump(ast.parse(c),indent=2))

output (Python 3.15.0b3+dev):

Module(
body=[
Match(
subject=Constant(value=0),
cases=[
match_case(
pattern=MatchValue(
value=Constant(value=0)),
body=[
Pass()]),
match_case(
pattern=MatchValue(
value=UnaryOp(
op=USub(),
operand=Constant(value=0))),
body=[
Pass()])]),
Expr(
value=UnaryOp(
op=UAdd(),
operand=Constant(value=0))),
Expr(
value=UnaryOp(
op=USub(),
operand=Constant(value=0)))])

+0 is parsed to Constant(value=0) instead of UnaryOp(op=UAdd(),operand=Constant(value=0)) when it is used as a match-expression.

This was really unexpected for me and can maybe produce some problems with ast.parse/unparse roundtripps or code which works with the ast and require workarounds (like in my case)

Is it possible to implement this in a way that it generates UnaryOp(...)?

@johnslavik you implemented this #148566, maybe you can help me here.

CPython versions tested on:

3.15

Operating systems tested on:

No response

Linked PRs

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    interpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)topic-parsertype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions