Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
gh-103225: Fixed zero lineno issue for pdb - #103265
Conversation
artemmukhin
commented
Apr 5, 2023
Sure! Thank you for extracting the workaround and the test for Regarding adding co-authors, this article might be helpful. But that is fine anyway 🙂 |
Co-authored-by: Artem Mukhin <ortem00@gmail.com>
73afc79 to
0b3c3b8Comparegaogaotiantian
commented
Apr 5, 2023
Thanks! That's helpful! |
gaogaotiantian
commented
Apr 6, 2023
@iritkatriel could you take a look at this fix which originally was done in |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
iritkatriel
commented
Apr 6, 2023
I've added the "co-authored by" line to the first comment. |
gaogaotiantian
commented
Apr 6, 2023
I redid the commit with co-authored-by so @ortem is showing as the co-author in the commit now. |
…D3JVU.rst Co-authored-by: Irit Katriel <1055913+iritkatriel@users.noreply.github.com>
iritkatriel
commented
Apr 6, 2023
I’m not sure that would work, because we squash the commits when merging and typically remove the individual commit messages. It does get picked up from the description of the PR though. |
gaogaotiantian
commented
Apr 6, 2023
Hmm, interesting to know that. Next time I'll do it in the PR. |
iritkatriel
commented
Apr 7, 2023
Actually I think more accurately - GitHub probably picks up the coauthor from the commit message, but the person who merges typically deletes all the individual commit messages, and is more likely to notice the "co-authored by" in the main message and not erase it. |
Co-authored-by: Artem Mukhin <ortem00@gmail.com>
gaogaotiantian
commented
May 5, 2023
@iritkatriel should we port this back to 3.11? |
iritkatriel
commented
May 6, 2023
We could, if this bug is there as well. Could you check to make sure, and then make a PR for 3.11? |
Co-authored-by: Artem Mukhin <ortem00@gmail.com>
bedevere-bot
commented
May 7, 2023
GH-104262 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
gaogaotiantian
commented
May 7, 2023
Confirmed that 3.11 has this issue as well, PR was made. |
According to #103225,
inspect.getsourcelines()returns wrong line number. Fixing it itinspectwill take extra discussion so we fixed it inpdbfor now. If in the future this got fixed ininspectwe can take the fix away.Co-authored-by: Artem Mukhin ortem00@gmail.com