Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, The type of
Sentinels.Nullis justSentinels. For Python enums, all enum members are instances of the enum class. (This is why I was wondering if maybe theNullclass should just be left as it is; it maybe needs to be its own class, rather than sharing the same class as the other sentinel values.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, you're right.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps we should amend this instead:
cpython/Tools/clinic/clinic.py
Lines 2605 to 2607 in dcdc90d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think my approach is fundamentally flawed. This is pretty simple really: we simply want distinct (sentinel) types for
default_typeand the instance check (🥁).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if we're in agreement or not (possibly my brain's going fuzzy at the end of a long day 😆), but I think for this PR, I might keep the refactor for
unspecifiedandunknown, but leaveNullas it is onmain.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fab, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The annotation for
default_typeis probably also incorrect.cpython/Tools/clinic/clinic.py
Lines 2598 to 2607 in dcdc90d
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks correct to me based on the comment and usage. But maybe I'm not seeing something. What makes you think it's incorrect?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With a custom converter, you can override pretty much anything (AFAIK), so I think
bltns.type[Any]is too narrow. I might be wrong.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment indicates that
defaulthas to be an instance ofdefault_typeifdefault_typeis notNone, andisintance(x, Foo)for any givenxwill fail ifFoois not an instance of type or a tuple of objects which are instances oftype