Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
gh-105481: add pseudo-instructions to the cases DSL - #105506
Conversation
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
iritkatriel
commented
Jun 8, 2023
I'll look into adding unit tests for the generator. |
iritkatriel
commented
Jun 8, 2023
Actually the test are not running anymore, right? (I mean the ones in Tools/cases_generator/test_generator.py). |
gvanrossum
commented
Jun 9, 2023
Sadly those must be run manually (since they use pytest) and I have neglected to do so, so they are broken. I've filed gh-105540 for that. |
gvanrossum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A great start. I suppose before you land this you are going to make it so that the new metadata is actually used? Or will that be a separate PR?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
gvanrossum
commented
Jun 11, 2023
I guess still waiting for the pseudo PR? |
iritkatriel
commented
Jun 11, 2023
I’m not sure where we would use the metadata for pseudo instructions. It probably makes sense to add assertions in the places where we map them to real instructions, that the metadata is the same. I’ll have a look tomorrow (or so). |
gvanrossum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, I was confusing this PR with gh-105482. That one uses the metadata. This one LGTM!
bedevere-bot
commented
Jun 11, 2023
|
bedevere-bot
commented
Jun 11, 2023
|
gvanrossum
commented
Jun 13, 2023
I found some bugs, here are fixes: |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.