Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
gh-76785: Return an "excinfo" Object From Interpreter.run() - #111573
Merged
ericsnowcurrently merged 4 commits intoNov 23, 2023
Conversation
ericsnowcurrentlyforce-pushed
the
interp-run-return-exc-info
branch
4 times, most recently
from
November 2, 2023 16:18
5443e2c to
3f56dbfCompareericsnowcurrentlyforce-pushed
the
interp-run-return-exc-info
branch
from
November 3, 2023 22:36
3f56dbf to
f25d3f9Compareericsnowcurrently added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2023
…1715) I added _Py_excinfo to the internal API (and added its functions in Python/errors.c) in gh-111530 (9322ce9). Since then I've had a nagging sense that I should have added the type and functions in its own PR. While I do plan on using _Py_excinfo outside crossinterp.c very soon (see gh-111572/gh-111573), I'd still feel more comfortable if the _Py_excinfo stuff went in as its own PR. Hence, here we are. (FWIW, I may combine that with gh-111572, which I may, in turn, combine with gh-111573. We'll see.)
ericsnowcurrentlyforce-pushed
the
interp-run-return-exc-info
branch
from
November 6, 2023 19:14
f25d3f9 to
9f83af7Comparehugovk pushed a commit
to hugovk/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2023
…ythongh-111715) I added _Py_excinfo to the internal API (and added its functions in Python/errors.c) in pythongh-111530 (9322ce9). Since then I've had a nagging sense that I should have added the type and functions in its own PR. While I do plan on using _Py_excinfo outside crossinterp.c very soon (see pythongh-111572/pythongh-111573), I'd still feel more comfortable if the _Py_excinfo stuff went in as its own PR. Hence, here we are. (FWIW, I may combine that with pythongh-111572, which I may, in turn, combine with pythongh-111573. We'll see.)
ericsnowcurrentlyforce-pushed
the
interp-run-return-exc-info
branch
from
November 23, 2023 00:33
9f83af7 to
dfff3e3Compareericsnowcurrently
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 23, 2023 00:48
ericsnowcurrently
requested review from
brettcannon, ncoghlan and warsaw
as code ownersNovember 23, 2023 00:48
ericsnowcurrently
enabled auto-merge (squash)
November 23, 2023 00:48
aisk pushed a commit
to aisk/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
…ythongh-111715) I added _Py_excinfo to the internal API (and added its functions in Python/errors.c) in pythongh-111530 (9322ce9). Since then I've had a nagging sense that I should have added the type and functions in its own PR. While I do plan on using _Py_excinfo outside crossinterp.c very soon (see pythongh-111572/pythongh-111573), I'd still feel more comfortable if the _Py_excinfo stuff went in as its own PR. Hence, here we are. (FWIW, I may combine that with pythongh-111572, which I may, in turn, combine with pythongh-111573. We'll see.)
aisk pushed a commit
to aisk/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2024
Glyphack pushed a commit
to Glyphack/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2024
…ythongh-111715) I added _Py_excinfo to the internal API (and added its functions in Python/errors.c) in pythongh-111530 (9322ce9). Since then I've had a nagging sense that I should have added the type and functions in its own PR. While I do plan on using _Py_excinfo outside crossinterp.c very soon (see pythongh-111572/pythongh-111573), I'd still feel more comfortable if the _Py_excinfo stuff went in as its own PR. Hence, here we are. (FWIW, I may combine that with pythongh-111572, which I may, in turn, combine with pythongh-111573. We'll see.)
Glyphack pushed a commit
to Glyphack/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.