Fix trivial typo in test_interpreters

[jeff5]

Just one letter, but it was making test_interpreters fail to compile.

[ericsnowcurrently]

LGTM

[jeff5]

Thanks @ericsnowcurrently . It needs a couple of labels to satisfy Sir Bedevere, which I don't think I can add. The Windows failure appears to be an unrelated fault in a specific helper script on Win32, which isn't an obstacle for me.

[serhiy-storchaka]

Note that ./python -m test.test_interpreters does nothing in 3.11 and 3.12. It would be nice to fix this.

[jeff5]

Note that ./python -m test.test_interpreters does nothing in 3.11 and 3.12. It would be nice to fix this.

Is this asking me to add anything to the present PR? IIUC that command works in 3.13a+ thanks to @ericsnowcurrently's repackaging of test_interpreters, with this typo fixed, which seems a different PR.

Is the continuing failure of the Windows build an obstacle to merging?

[serhiy-storchaka]

Nothing to add to this PR. It will be merged when all checks be passed (the failure of Windows build is a matter of luck).

Since this PR does not have an associated issue, and the issue that turned test_inerpreters into package is already closed, I mentioned it here. It would be nice to make test_inerpreters executable in 3.11 and 3.12 by adding the unittest.main() call. It is also a trivial change. If anybody of you, @jeff5 and @ericsnowcurrently, do this, nice. Otherwise I will do it.

[jeff5]

I'd be happy to save you a task. I understand this as:

• Two PRs, one targeting each maintenance tip.
• Just PRs (not an issue) because you wrote "trivial".
• I should use the "backport" style of title for each PR (guidance in the PR template).
• GitHub will summon @ericsnowcurrently because of the code owners thing and he'll put me right if I'm not.

I see the Windows test has magically gone right just when it was needed. :)