functools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "referenceable"

[rodrigogiraoserrao]

Fixes a typo in the last paragraph of the docs on partial objects, https://docs.python.org/3/library/functools.html#partial-objects

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--113675.org.readthedocs.build/

[Eclips4]

Per https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/referencable this doesn't looks as a typo.
cc @AlexWaygood as a english native speaker

[AlexWaygood]

Both are acceptable spellings, but "referenceable" is the more common one, and does look more natural to my eyes. So I'm happy for this to go in :)

[miss-islington-app]

Thanks @rodrigogiraoserrao for the PR, and @AlexWaygood for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11, 3.12.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

[bedevere-app]

GH-113677 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch.

[bedevere-app]

GH-113678 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

[Eclips4]

Both are acceptable spellings, but "referenceable" is the more common one, and does look more natural to my eyes. So I'm happy for this to go in :)

We also have at least three similar situations: c-api/weakref.rst (38 and 50 lines) and newtypes.rst (548 line). Should we fix it?

[AlexWaygood]

We also have at least three similar situations: c-api/weakref.rst (38 and 50 lines) and newtypes.rst (548 line). Should we fix it?

If you make a PR, I'll probably merge it -- but also, I wouldn't say it's a priority, since both are acceptable spellings :)

[rodrigogiraoserrao]

Merriam-Webster and the Oxford Learner's Dictionary seem to disagree, https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/referencable & https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/spellcheck/english/?q=referencable

I won't push more than this, though, as I'm not a native speaker.