Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
JIT README: How to install LLVM on Fedora Linux - #118983
Conversation
hroncok
commented
May 13, 2024
As a side note, I've also inquired about having LLVM 18 available in Fedora Linux 39. |
Miro, is this really should target 3.13 branch? I guess you have chose this one accidentally. |
No worries! Bad things happens sometimes with Github UI/UX :). I've dismissed requests for review from everyone except Brandt. |
However, I'm wondering why changing README.md triggers our CI/CD actions (I mean actions that build the interpreter and run the test suite). This obviously should not happen for this kind of changes. This could be easily fixed by changing the diff --git a/.github/workflows/jit.yml b/.github/workflows/jit.yml
index 7152cde8f4..1ac2829f0a 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/jit.yml+++ b/.github/workflows/jit.yml@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
name: JIT
on:
pull_request:
+ paths-ignore:+ - 'Tools/jit/README.md'
paths:
- '**jit**'
- 'Python/bytecodes.c'Perhaps it's not worth the effort because README is rarely changed. |
savannahostrowski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM - thanks for adding this!
ericsnowcurrently
commented
May 14, 2024
That makes sense to me. @brandtbucher, what do you think? |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
hugovk
commented
May 14, 2024
Could also ignore |
Co-authored-by: Erlend E. Aasland <erlend.aasland@protonmail.com>
| Install LLVM 18 on Fedora Linux 40 or newer: | ||
| ```sh | ||
| sudo dnf install 'clang(major) = 18' 'llvm(major) = 18' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this! Just double-checking, is the separate Clang install necessary (it's not bundled with the LLVM install)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct. Installing just LLVM does not install clang. Neither the other way around.
brandtbucher
commented
May 16, 2024
Also, if somebody wants to open a PR to ignore JIT CI on the following files, go ahead:
|
savannahostrowski
commented
May 16, 2024
Happy to do that! @brandtbucher |
Thanks @hroncok for the PR, and @brandtbucher for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13. |
GH-119100 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
cc @brandtbucher