Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
gh-127146: Emscripten: Skip segfaults in test suite - #127151
Conversation
a281d38 to
c11b73bCompare
mdboom
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry if this sounds overly pedantic, but isn't this "skipping tests that segfault" rather than "fixing tests that segfault"? It's a completely reasonably path to skip these tests and then come back later to fix them (if they matter), but I would suggest changing the PR title / commit message.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
hoodmane
commented
Nov 23, 2024
As a mathematician I have no right to call anyone pedantic under practically any circumstances. |
After this, Emscripten makes it all the way through the test suite when I run it locally.
c11b73b to
c6425eaComparehoodmane
commented
Nov 23, 2024
Seems like I can remove a lot of these xfails if I set |
hoodmane
commented
Nov 23, 2024
Nevermind that is not true. |
freakboy3742
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The set of changes all looks fine to me.
However, if this is going to be a common mode of failure for tests (which this PR seems to indicate it will be), I'd rather see it pulled into a utility decorator, analogous to requires_subprocess (e.g., requires_full_stack?) so that the skip message is consistent.
hoodmane
commented
Nov 30, 2024
Okay @freakboy3742 I made a common method for the stack-overflow skips. I also updated the description according to @mdboom's complaint. I have made the requested changes; please review again |
Thanks for making the requested changes! @freakboy3742, @mdboom: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
freakboy3742
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One possible cleanup that I should have found on my first pass. There's also a bunch of CI failures that I'm fairly sure are due to one misapplied test decorator.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
hoodmane
commented
Dec 2, 2024
Okay, I have made the requested changes; please review again |
Thanks for making the requested changes! @mdboom, @freakboy3742: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
freakboy3742
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM - thanks for those fixes!
freakboy3742
commented
Dec 2, 2024
Eclips4
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
test_ast changes looks good to me.
hoodmane
commented
Dec 4, 2024
If @mdboom doesn't come back to approve this, maybe you can merge it @freakboy3742? I think I addressed his comment... |
After this, Emscripten makes it all the way through the test suite when I run it locally.