gh-88473: Implement fast path in date.today() for date types

[StanFromIreland]

Other suggested implementations are not as backward compatible.

$ ./python -m timeit -s 'from datetime import date' 'date.today()'
1000000 loops, best of 5: 271 nsec per loop
$ python3.14 -m timeit -s 'from datetime import date' 'date.today()'
200000 loops, best of 5: 1.36 usec per loop

~5x faster for date types

• Issue: date.today() is half as fast as datetime.now().date() #88473

[picnixz]

Are the benchmarks realised on a PGO build or a debug build? or maybe PGO+LTO? or just release build?

[StanFromIreland]

Both are just plain builds. python3.14 is from the morning but I doubt the few commits matter.

[picnixz]

By plain builds, do you mean with or withou --with-pydebug? I assume without so it's probably release builds so it should be fine. But please the configure flags

[StanFromIreland]

@pganssle can you take a look at this?

[picnixz]

On my part, it looks good but I'll let a datetime expert have the final decision.

[StanFromIreland]

Friendly ping @pganssle Any comments on this?

[StanFromIreland]

Friendly ping @pganssle :-)

[pganssle]

This is an acceptable way to do it, but IIRC we already pushed some of this kind of dispatching logic in new_date_subclass_ex, so I think you can replace the entire contents of date_today with this:

staticPyObject*date_today(PyObject*cls, PyObject*Py_UNUSED(dummy))
{
/* Use C implementation to boost performance for date type */structtmtm;
time_tt;
time(&t);
if (_PyTime_localtime(t, &tm) !=0) {
returnNULL;
}
returnnew_date_subclass_ex(tm.tm_year+1900,
tm.tm_mon+1,
tm.tm_mday,
(PyObject*)cls);
}

And you'll get the same speedup and as a bonus datetime.today() will also get the same speedup.

[bedevere-app]

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

[StanFromIreland]

And you'll get the same speedup and as a bonus datetime.today() will also get the same speedup.

It will be incorrect though? Since datetime.today has hours, minutes etc.

[pganssle]

It will be incorrect though? Since datetime.today has hours, minutes etc.

Hah, oops, right, right. Should have run the test suite and not just the benchmark.

OK, let's go with this as it is and if we want to speed up datetime.today we can add an implementation for datetime.datetime that is just effectively return datetime.now(tz=None).