Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35.2k
gh-124397: Add threading.iter_locked#133908
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Changes from all commits
6313b3d5ced0a9110332eb6756314406050d30ace8baec5bce6ea2857315c49b7c9d77bb98c52946ee517e3653aFile filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ | ||
| import time | ||
| import unittest | ||
| from threading import Thread, Barrier, iter_locked | ||
| from test.support import threading_helper | ||
| threading_helper.requires_working_threading(module=True) | ||
| class non_atomic_iterator: | ||
| def __init__(self, it): | ||
| self.it = iter(it) | ||
| def __iter__(self): | ||
| return self | ||
| def __next__(self): | ||
| a = next(self.it) | ||
| t = time.perf_counter() + 1e-6 | ||
| while time.perf_counter() < t: | ||
| pass | ||
| b = next(self.it) | ||
Member There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Add | ||
| return a, b | ||
| def count(): | ||
| i = 0 | ||
| while True: | ||
| i += 1 | ||
| yield i | ||
| class iter_lockedThreading(unittest.TestCase): | ||
| @threading_helper.reap_threads | ||
| def test_iter_locked(self): | ||
| number_of_threads = 10 | ||
| number_of_iterations = 8 | ||
| barrier = Barrier(number_of_threads) | ||
| def work(it): | ||
| while True: | ||
| try: | ||
| a, b = next(it) | ||
| assert a + 1 == b | ||
| except StopIteration: | ||
| break | ||
| data = tuple(range(400)) | ||
| for it in range(number_of_iterations): | ||
| iter_locked_iterator = iter_locked(non_atomic_iterator(data,)) | ||
| worker_threads = [] | ||
| for ii in range(number_of_threads): | ||
| worker_threads.append( | ||
| Thread(target=work, args=[iter_locked_iterator])) | ||
| with threading_helper.start_threads(worker_threads): | ||
| pass | ||
| barrier.reset() | ||
| @threading_helper.reap_threads | ||
| def test_iter_locked_generator(self): | ||
| number_of_threads = 5 | ||
| number_of_iterations = 4 | ||
| barrier = Barrier(number_of_threads) | ||
| def work(it): | ||
| barrier.wait() | ||
| for _ in range(1_000): | ||
| try: | ||
| next(it) | ||
| except StopIteration: | ||
| break | ||
| for it in range(number_of_iterations): | ||
| generator = iter_locked(count()) | ||
| worker_threads = [] | ||
| for ii in range(number_of_threads): | ||
| worker_threads.append( | ||
| Thread(target=work, args=[generator])) | ||
| with threading_helper.start_threads(worker_threads): | ||
| pass | ||
| barrier.reset() | ||
| if __name__ == "__main__": | ||
| unittest.main() | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| Add :meth:`threading.iter_locked` to make concurrent iteration over an iterable execute using a lock. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure
non_atomic_iteratoris a good example of something that exists in the wild, because it's not thread-safe on GIL-ful builds either. The thread can arbitrarily switch during execution of Python code, so this would need a lock anyway if concurrent iteration were a use case. For free-threading,__next__itself should have its own locking to prevent races. How was this design reached?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
iter_lockedallows thenon_atomic_iteratorto be used in a threaded-setting, whether in the normal or FT build. Do you have suggestions for other tests?