Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bpo-37094: Add example for TestCase.skipTest in unittest doc - #13645
Conversation
csabella
commented
May 29, 2019
Hi @MakDon, please create a bug tracker issue for this and link the bpo number in the title. Thanks! |
MakDon
commented
May 29, 2019
Hi @csabella , according to Python Developer’s Guide, Trivial issues (e.g. typo fixes) do not require any issue to be created. It's just a document updating, so maybe it is not important enough to create an issue on issues tracker. Thank you for your reply! :D |
csabella
commented
May 29, 2019
Yes, it's not obvious what trivial means, but it's really just a pull request with only a few typo fixes. Adding an additional example is more than trivial. Also, some core devs primary way of discovering issues is through the bug tracker, so adding a PR without a bug tracker link increases that likelihood of a change not being reviewed. It's usually better to have a bpo number than to not have one. 🙂 |
MakDon
commented
May 30, 2019
zware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Needs a little bit of cleanup, but I think this will end up as a nice improvement!
| # windows specific testing code | ||
| pass | ||
| def test_skip_me(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you take my second suggestion for the body of this example method, it could use a better name ("test_maybe_skipped" or similar, perhaps).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bedevere-bot
commented
May 31, 2019
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
Co-Authored-By: Zachary Ware <zachary.ware@gmail.com>
MakDon
commented
May 31, 2019
@zware Thanks for your suggestions. |
Update unittest according @zware's suggestions.
MakDon
commented
May 31, 2019
I have made the requested changes; please review again. |
bedevere-bot
commented
May 31, 2019
Thanks for making the requested changes! @zware: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
MakDon
commented
May 31, 2019
Cause Python 3.8.0b1 branch cut-off date moved to Monday, could i see this document update in 3.8? :D |
zware
commented
May 31, 2019
There is no restriction on documentation improvements; this will apply to 3.7 and beyond :) |
miss-islington
commented
May 31, 2019
Thanks @MakDon for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7. |
…H-13645) Also includes other minor test skipping doc improvements. https://bugs.python.org/issue37094 (cherry picked from commit ffed76b) Co-authored-by: Makdon <makdon@makdon.me>
bedevere-bot
commented
May 31, 2019
GH-13701 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch. |
Also includes other minor test skipping doc improvements. https://bugs.python.org/issue37094 (cherry picked from commit ffed76b) Co-authored-by: Makdon <makdon@makdon.me>
…H-13645) Also includes other minor test skipping doc improvements. https://bugs.python.org/issue37094
Also includes other minor test skipping doc improvements.
https://bugs.python.org/issue37094