Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35.2k
gh-136728: Combine OpenSSL and AWS-LC CI configurations#144805
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
61c8ef3
gh-136728: Combine OpenSSL and AWS-LC CI configurations
zware 3809ebb
fixup! gh-136728: Combine OpenSSL and AWS-LC CI configurations
zware 402c06d
fixup! gh-136728: Combine OpenSSL and AWS-LC CI configurations
zware 4676575
fixup! gh-136728: Combine OpenSSL and AWS-LC CI configurations
zware 2543718
fixup! gh-136728: Combine OpenSSL and AWS-LC CI configurations
zware 8f9044b
Revert "fixup! gh-136728: Combine OpenSSL and AWS-LC CI configurations"
zware 0b98838
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into bump_multissl_awslc
zware 4b33b4e
fixup! gh-136728: Combine OpenSSL and AWS-LC CI configurations
zware 4a81ca2
fixup! gh-136728: Combine OpenSSL and AWS-LC CI configurations
zware File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ | ||
| ] | ||
| AWSLC_RECENT_VERSIONS = [ | ||
| "1.55.0", | ||
| "1.68.0", | ||
| ] | ||
zware marked this conversation as resolved.
Uh oh!There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. | ||
| # store files in ../multissl | ||
| @@ -108,7 +108,10 @@ | ||
| ).format(LIBRESSL_RECENT_VERSIONS, LIBRESSL_OLD_VERSIONS) | ||
| ) | ||
| parser.add_argument( | ||
| '--aws-lc', | ||
| # Soft-deprecated alias | ||
| '--awslc', | ||
| dest='awslc', | ||
| nargs='+', | ||
| default=(), | ||
| help=( | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nested objects in the matrix generally cause difficulties. So yes, that other PR solves this bit better. I understand the desire to couple libs with their versions and it might be reasonable to just use strings like
openssl == 3.0.19and split them where necessary.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What difficulties?