Skip to content

bpo-10572: Move test sub-packages to Lib/test - #18524

Closed
idomic wants to merge 30 commits into
python:masterfrom
idomic:bpo-10572-reArranging_Lib_tests
Closed

bpo-10572: Move test sub-packages to Lib/test#18524
idomic wants to merge 30 commits into
python:masterfrom
idomic:bpo-10572-reArranging_Lib_tests

Conversation

@idomic

@idomicidomic commented Feb 16, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@idomic
idomicforce-pushed the bpo-10572-reArranging_Lib_tests branch from 746c83b to 36b41ebCompareFebruary 16, 2020 18:20

@ned-deilyned-deily left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please make sure that tests still run correctly when running from an installed instance of Python, not just from a development build directory. The various test directories are installed in the main Makefile (Makefile.pre.in) libinstall rule. I think you'll find that many tests are now broken. See the LIBSUBDIRS variable in the Makefile. (I see that the dev guide does not refer to this topic so I've opened a devguide issue about it: python/devguide#573)

@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@idomic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @ned-deily , I've updated the makefile and adding a News file.
I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@ned-deily: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@idomic
idomic requested a review from a team as a code ownerFebruary 16, 2020 23:10
@idomic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Ok I fixed all of the tests expect 1 in lib2to3 in which I'm not really sure what's going on.

@idomic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

When looking on the test that's failing:

test_write_filtered_python_package (test.test_zipfile.PyZipFileTests) ... File "/Users/runner/runners/2.164.0/work/cpython/cpython/Lib/test/lib2to3_tests/data/bom.py", line 2
print "BOM BOOM!"

It looks like it uses print syntax of python 2.7 which is not relevant anymore, any idea why is it there? I suspect in the master it was just not running and because now it's in the tests folder it's running by default.

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@ned-deily: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@brettcannon
brettcannon self-requested a review February 27, 2020 23:08
@brettcannon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@idomic it looks like it's a test file for the lib2to3 test to use. There's probably a test that reads that file, runs lib2to3 on it, and checks the results. So that file is very likely there on purpose and meant to be Python 2 syntax.

@brettcannon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@idomic you also have conflicts. It might be easier to do one PR per package so lessen the chances of merge conflicts occurring.

@brettcannonbrettcannon left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The merge conflicts need to be fixed, and I would strongly suggest breaking this PR up into single PRs per package.

@bedevere-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@idomic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The merge conflicts need to be fixed, and I would strongly suggest breaking this PR up into single PRs per package.

I'll submit a new PR with 1 package and will tag you and Ned

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@idomic@bedevere-bot@brettcannon@ned-deily@the-knights-who-say-ni