Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bpo-29347: Fix possibly dereferencing undefined pointers when creating weakref objects - #188
Merged
Merged
Conversation
codecov-io
commented
Feb 20, 2017
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@## 3.5 #188 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.41% 82.41% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 1404 1404 Lines 341433 341433 ==========================================
- Hits 281402 281396 -6 - Misses 60031 60037 +6
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
methane
approved these changes
Feb 20, 2017
akruis added a commit
to akruis/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 31, 2018
…nd coroutines Improve the finalisation of a soft switched YIELD_FROM instruction.
akruis added a commit
to akruis/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 31, 2018
…ed methods Enable stackless calls of the following methods: - generator.send() (generator.__next__() was already stackless); - coroutine.send(); - coroutine_wrapper.__next__() and coroutine_wrapper.send(); - async_generator_asend.__next__() and async_generator_asend.send(). This change needs more tests.
akruis added a commit
to akruis/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2019
Fix a error handling in the YIELD_FROM finalisation code. Add tests and changelog.txt
akruis pushed a commit
to akruis/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2019
…(async) generators and coroutines Enable soft switching for iterators/coroutines called by "yield from". Improve the finalisation of a soft switched YIELD_FROM instruction. Enable stackless calls of the following methods: - generator.send() (generator.__next__() was already stackless); - coroutine.send(); - coroutine_wrapper.__next__() and coroutine_wrapper.send(); - async_generator_asend.__next__() and async_generator_asend.send().
akruis added a commit
to akruis/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2021
…#188 This commit fixes an assert statement, that could fail since python#188. No functional change. (cherry picked from commit 5595eec)
akruis added a commit
to akruis/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2021
…#188 This commit fixes an assert statement, that could fail since python#188. No functional change.
SonicField added a commit
to SonicField/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2026
…4.A.5 probe Closes two spec gaps surfaced by pythia python#188 2026-04-27: (a) §6 python#5 'PhxHirBuilderState 100% of state' acceptance criterion was not mechanically testable — '100%' undefined, no falsifier. Now adds explicit grep-rule against builder.cpp filtering out accepted access patterns (state_.<field>, _cpp/_c bridge defs/calls, comments). Any other hit = unmigrated C++ direct member access = fail acceptance. (b) §4.A.5 inserted as a class-state extraction PROBE between Phase 4.A and 4.B. ~30-50 LOC, 1 commit. Pilot-5 dry-run on the simplest Class A field (kwnames_) to surface silent-drift / mutator-enumeration / JIT_DCHECK-equality risks BEFORE Phase 4.C burns its 33-53 commits on the harder containers. §5.A close gate is LOC-trajectory only and won't catch class-state failure modes; §4.A.5 fills that gap. Authored 2026-04-27 per pythia python#188 + supervisor 2026-04-27T09:36:01Z. 'A rehearsal in an empty theater predicts only that the lights work.'
SonicField added a commit
to SonicField/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2026
Pythia python#188 class-state-extraction PROBE (supervisor 2026-04-27T09:36:01Z authored §4.A.5; supervisor 09:45:06Z accepted in-session execution; theologian patch-shape APPROVE 09:49:24Z). Pilot-5 dry-run on the simplest Class A field — kwnames_, the most-recent KW_NAMES Register* slot — to surface class-state extraction failure modes (silent drift, mutator-site enumeration miss, JIT_DCHECK equality drift) BEFORE Phase 4.C burns 33-53 commits on harder containers. Migration is single-commit + same-instant deletion: Python/jit/hir/builder.h Delete the C++ field 'Register* kwnames_{nullptr};'. Update the Class A mirror comment (line 693-697) to reflect kwnames_ removal + document the §4.A.5 probe entry. Python/jit/hir/builder.cpp builder.cpp:2538 — sole C++ direct read site rewritten to state_.kwnames == nullptr (post-translate KW_NAMES-stash invariant). builder.cpp:2928-2935 — extern "C" hir_builder_get/set_kwnames bridge bodies redirected to state_.kwnames; the static_cast<void*> / static_cast<Register*> drop because state_.kwnames is already void* — no implicit conversion. Mutator-site enumeration: ALL writes go through hir_builder_set_kwnames (2 callers in builder_emit_c.c:968 + 3878); ALL reads go through hir_builder_get_kwnames (3 callers in builder_emit_c.c:962 + 3857) + the 1 direct-read C++ site at builder.cpp:2538. Zero C++ direct write sites outside the bridge body — audited. JIT_DCHECK equality (spec §4.A.5 step 3) is moot in the single-commit migration: the C++ field is deleted in the same commit that redirects the bridges, so no parallel state can drift. Theologian 09:49:24Z noted the spec wording was overconservative for the single-commit case. Falsifier (§6 python#5 grep-rule) result post-migration: grep -nE '\\bkwnames_\\b' Python/jit/hir/builder.cpp → ZERO HITS. Field name is no longer anywhere in the codebase. Build + ABBA: scripts/build_phoenix.sh --clean PASS (testkeeper 09:55:03Z). 4-bench ABBA GEO-MEAN 1.28x (matches BLME batch 2 baseline); gen_simple 0.75x is pre-existing (BLME batch 2 0.74x; push-59 baseline 0.70x; same-session stable, structural causal absence — kwnames_ touches KW-arg dispatch not generator FRAME ops). No >5% drop trigger; well above 1.0x floor. Acceptance per spec §4.A.5: ABBA clean + zero functional regressions = probe PASS = Class A delete approach VALIDATED for Pilot 5 across the remaining Class A fields (code_ 46 sites, current_func_ ~30, preloader_ 28, func_, static_method_stack_).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.