Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bpo-29587: Add another test for the gen.throw() exception chain fix - #19859
Merged
Conversation
cjerdonek
commented
May 2, 2020
MemberAuthor
I've skipped the NEWS entry since this adds to an issue that already has a NEWS entry. |
cjerdonekforce-pushed
the
issue-29587-another-test
branch
from
May 3, 2020 07:13
aa3ff76 to
649401dComparecjerdonek
commented
May 3, 2020
MemberAuthor
Rebased after merging PR #19877. |
cjerdonekforce-pushed
the
issue-29587-another-test
branch
from
May 8, 2020 09:24
649401d to
b4cf70fComparecjerdonekforce-pushed
the
issue-29587-another-test
branch
2 times, most recently
from
May 17, 2020 02:14
baed425 to
dd6f901Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR just adds another failing test for bpo-29587 (following the fix in PR #19823). It tests something slightly different. I confirmed that the test fails prior to PR #19823.
https://bugs.python.org/issue29587