Skip to content

bpo-29602: fix signed zero handling in complex constructor - #204

Merged
mdickinson merged 2 commits into
2.7from
bpo-29549-backport
Feb 20, 2017
Merged

bpo-29602: fix signed zero handling in complex constructor#204
mdickinson merged 2 commits into
2.7from
bpo-29549-backport

Conversation

@mdickinson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Backport of #203 to 2.7 branch (cherry-pick of 112ec38).

@mdickinsonmdickinson added type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error cherry-pick for 2.7 labels Feb 20, 2017

@serhiy-storchakaserhiy-storchaka left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wrong issue number. Otherwise LGTM.

@serhiy-storchakaserhiy-storchaka changed the title bpo-29549: fix signed zero handling in complex constructorbpo-29602: fix signed zero handling in complex constructorFeb 20, 2017
@codecov

codecovBot commented Feb 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (2.7@7131a73). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@ Coverage Diff @@## 2.7 #204 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage ? 83.38% ======================================
Files ? 1367 Lines ? 344903 Branches ? 0 ======================================
Hits ? 287604 Misses ? 57299 Partials ? 0

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7131a73...23e14d6. Read the comment docs.

@mdickinson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Thanks, @serhiy-storchaka. Two more on the way ...

@mdickinson
mdickinson merged commit c0b336e into 2.7Feb 20, 2017
@mdickinson
mdickinson deleted the bpo-29549-backport branch February 20, 2017 21:14
akruis added a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2019
…ain tasklet
Fix issue python#204 and bpo-24596. Now the special SystemExit handling is used
for non-main tasklets of the main-thread of the primary interpreter only.
A test case is in upstream commit d8cba5d (not yet merged).
akruis added a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2019
…ain tasklet
Fix issue python#204 and bpo-24596. Now the special SystemExit handling is used
for non-main tasklets of the main-thread of the primary interpreter only.
A test case is in upstream commit e1ebf51 (not yet merged).
(cherry picked from commit 34768b4)
jaraco pushed a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mdickinson@serhiy-storchaka@the-knights-who-say-ni