Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bpo-40939: Remove the old parser - #20768
Conversation
c1a2097 to
27a0c11Compare
remilapeyre
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi, there is also a note in Doc/using/cmdline.rst that will need to be removed.
pablogsal
commented
Jun 10, 2020
Thanks for the catch! |
62192dd to
3dc1827Compare
lysnikolaou
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This LGTM! Amazing work, I couldn't find a single miss! 🚀
Also, I guess this is what we've been really working for in the last months. Feels good!
a4055e4 to
738a7aeComparepablogsal
commented
Jun 11, 2020
I plan to land this tomorrow as this PR keeps getting merge conflicts from everywhere and it will be easier to fix small things in future PRs if needed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This file is comparing the ast of the old parser to the last of the new parser, so it serves no purpose anymore. We have been adding all negative cases (testing extensions) into other files so we won't lose anything
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
e11e688 to
1ad8ff2CompareI have rebased again to solve more merge conflicts. Could you review again? |
Update cmdline.rst 📜🤖 Added by blurb_it. Clean some tests and bring back some deleted cases
1ad8ff2 to
635a9e2Compare
gvanrossum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if we could backport the file renames? (Not the moves from Parser/pegen/* to Parser/*, but the rename of parse.c to parser.c and parse_string.c to string_parser.c.)
pablogsal
commented
Jun 11, 2020
👍 I will try to make a PR later today with that |
gvanrossum
commented
Jun 11, 2020
via email
Land it! |
https://bugs.python.org/issue40939