Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bpo-44313: generate LOAD_ATTR/CALL_FUNCTION for top-level imported objects - #26677
Conversation
86f2a4d to
c7c708cCompare
markshannon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great. Just two very minor issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bedevere-bot
commented
Jun 14, 2021
When you're done making the requested changes, leave the comment: |
isidentical
commented
Jun 18, 2021
I have made the requested changes; please review again |
bedevere-bot
commented
Jun 18, 2021
Thanks for making the requested changes! @markshannon: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
markshannon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good now.
Sorry I missed your update, so importlib needs updating again.
isidentical
commented
Jun 29, 2021
Okay will regenerate them tomorrow. |
bedevere-bot
commented
Jun 30, 2021
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @isidentical for commit ab1b6c1 🤖 If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again. |
markshannon
commented
Jun 30, 2021
Thanks. |
| # Python 3.11a1 3455 (add MAKE_CELL bpo-43693) | ||
| # Python 3.11a1 3456 (interleave cell args bpo-43693) | ||
| # Python 3.11a1 3457 (Change localsplus to a bytes object bpo-43693) | ||
| # Python 3.11a1 3458 (imported objects now don't use LOAD_METHOD/CALL_METHOD) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't the actual number be bumped below? I don't think it matters much in this case, but for the sake of consistency/clarity for the next bump, it might be good to fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Right, probably got away during rebase. Will fix
https://bugs.python.org/issue44313