Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[3.10] bpo-44490: Partially backport GH-26980's refactoring for easier bugfix backports - #27203
[3.10] bpo-44490: Partially backport GH-26980's refactoring for easier bugfix backports#27203Fidget-Spinner wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ugfix backports Co-Authored-By: Ken Jin <28750310+Fidget-Spinner@users.noreply.github.com> Co-Authored-By: Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Yurii Karabas <1998uriyyo@gmail.com>
Fidget-Spinner
commented
Jul 17, 2021
This is mainly for Serhiy's planned refactoring (see GH-27196). I did not backport any of the new features, only the code refactoring. |
Fidget-Spinner
commented
Jul 17, 2021
Hmm I don't understand the failure in These functions are newly added, how can they be removed? |
serhiy-storchaka
commented
Jul 17, 2021
You're right that most things should backport cleanly. It's only required if you want to backport shifting or using
Yup. Maybe if you review and approve GH-26980, Pablo will allow us to backport it to 3.10. |
Fidget-Spinner
commented
Jul 17, 2021
Closing this since GH-27207 has been approved. |
(cherry picked from c45fa1a)
https://bugs.python.org/issue44490