Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that this code is 100% reliable if lock.release() gets interrupted by a second exception (ex: raised by a second signal: fatality!). Maybe a context manager could be used. But I'm exhausted, I will think about this code after a good night :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe we've still got bugs in the context manager exit implementation where even it can miss something in this scenario and not call
__exit__. https://bugs.python.org/issue29988This came up during the dev sprint in 2017 when working on the interpreter loop.
So this PR, while not technically a fix, is at least an improvement and should help the single Ctrl-C KeyboardInterrupt case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The whole function should be reimplemented in C to better control how signals are handled.
In pure Python, I don't think that it's possible to fully control handle any possible exception at any line number.
@serhiy-storchaka proposed to rewrite acquire()+release() in C to make sure that at least the lock remains consistent: https://bugs.python.org/issue45274#msg402532 So it doesn't handle exceptions in the _stop() method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But I only wanted to enhance the code, I'm not interested to rewrite threading.Thread in C.