Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove empty footnote section - #30451
Conversation
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
nedbat
commented
Feb 11, 2022
@encukou Can we get this merged? |
kumaraditya303
commented
Mar 3, 2022
@JelleZijlstra This can be merged. |
JelleZijlstra
commented
Mar 8, 2022
Going to merge this into 3.10 and main only because in the 3.9 docs there is a footnote. (cc @gvanrossum) |
miss-islington
commented
Mar 8, 2022
Thanks @nedbat for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10. |
bedevere-bot
commented
Mar 8, 2022
GH-31745 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
(cherry picked from commit 13331a1) Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>
(cherry picked from commit 13331a1) Co-authored-by: Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>
jaraco
commented
Mar 13, 2022
This change gets overwritten when syncing the changes from importlib_metadata, such as in #31854. I can port the change to importlib_metadata so that doesn't happen, but please be cognizant of making editorial changes to importlib.metadata, importlib.resources, and the docs for importlib.metadata, as they're kept in sync with the backports. If you have any suggestions on how to guide contributors to limit these sorts of edits, please let me know. |
jaraco
commented
Mar 13, 2022
Ported as python/importlib_metadata@467dba53dd48. |
There are no footnotes on this page, so no need for a "Footnotes" header.