Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bpo-46443: deepfreeze use preallocated small ints - #30715
Conversation
kumaraditya303
commented
Jan 20, 2022
It is an implementation detail so skip news. |
gvanrossum
commented
Jan 20, 2022
I don't think that's how we usually do this. We skip news for things like fixing typos in comments, but almost anything else gets a new entry. Maybe you're confused with "What's New in 3.11"? That definitely only should get the major visible items. |
gvanrossum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LG except I would like to see a one-line news item.
Did you check how much space this saves? (Probably nut that much since ints are small.)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
kumaraditya303
commented
Jan 20, 2022
Ok, I'll add a news fragment. Should I create a bpo for this now ? |
gvanrossum
commented
Jan 20, 2022
Yeah. |
gvanrossum
commented
Jan 20, 2022
I recommend that you put a little more effort in writing the initial comment for the bpo issues you create. E.g. not just what to do, but why it's worth doing and what impact you expect. |
gvanrossum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! This was indeed super-simple. :-)
I would also do this for empty bytes object as that also has a global singleton. (DONE) |
gvanrossum
commented
Jan 20, 2022
Good idea. Maybe you can just add that to this PR, it's small enough. |
kumaraditya303
commented
Jan 20, 2022
I was confused by this PR as it skipped news #30092 |
gvanrossum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great! Now just waiting for CI to finish...
gvanrossum
commented
Jan 20, 2022
Different core devs have different standards... |
gvanrossum
commented
Jan 20, 2022
I'm the bot. :-) |
https://bugs.python.org/issue46443