Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So if your platform is little-endian, then passing
PY_BIG_ENDIANuses a little-endian format? That seems confusing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PY_BIG_ENDIAN is 1 on big endian platform, and 0 on little endian platform.
int.to_bytes() uses the native endian by default (if the
byte_orderparameter is not set). Maybe we could accept -1 to mean "use native endian"?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It uses big-endian by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops. You're right. I now recall a long discussion about the default :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, but it's primarily a problem with the naming of
PY_BIG_ENDIAN, which would perhaps be better spelled as something likePY_PLATFORM_ENDIAN_IS_BIG_ENDIAN.But usage of
PY_BIG_ENDIANis at least a little bit problematic, since there's nothing anywhere in C that guarantees that integer types and float types will use the same endianness (or even that float types have to follow one of big-endian or little-endian at all).I'd suggest leaving it as-is - it's easy enough to pass
PY_BIG_ENDIAN.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I proposed a different wording for the documentation: PR #31866. Is it better?