Skip to content

gh-82504: deprecate the MultiLoopChildWatcher - #94648

Closed
graingert wants to merge 16 commits into
python:mainfrom
graingert:deprecate-multi-loop-watcher
Closed

gh-82504: deprecate the MultiLoopChildWatcher#94648
graingert wants to merge 16 commits into
python:mainfrom
graingert:deprecate-multi-loop-watcher

Conversation

@graingert

@graingertgraingert commented Jul 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@graingertgraingert changed the title bpo-82504: deprecate the MultiLoopChildWatchergh-82504: deprecate the MultiLoopChildWatcherJul 7, 2022
@graingert
graingert marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2022 09:18
Comment threadMisc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-07-07-09-04-49.gh-issue-82504.6xtYAz.rst Outdated

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be better to add What's New entry about this deprecation.

…tYAz.rst
Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment threadDoc/library/asyncio-policy.rst Outdated
Comment threadDoc/library/asyncio-policy.rst Outdated
Comment threadDoc/whatsnew/3.12.rst Outdated
Comment threadDoc/whatsnew/3.12.rst
@graingert
graingertforce-pushed the deprecate-multi-loop-watcher branch from 84a0ca0 to 2e6e996CompareJuly 18, 2022 16:20

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@graingert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

thanks for the review @kumaraditya303 !

@kumaraditya303

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gvanrossum Would you like to review this? This deprecates MultiLoopChildWatcher which has race conditions so it is not even tested on CI currently, skipped on CI as of #26542.

@gvanrossum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I'm sorry, I don't feel comfortable reviewing this. Any core dev CC'ed on the issue would be more qualified than me.

@gvanrossum
gvanrossum removed their request for review July 18, 2022 23:12
@graingert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@kumaraditya303 can you request @njsmith on this?

@kumaraditya303

kumaraditya303 commented Oct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Superseded by #98089

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@graingert@kumaraditya303@gvanrossum@AlexWaygood@bedevere-bot