Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35.2k
gh-96143: Allow Linux perf profiler to see Python calls#96123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Changes from all commits
2a918e4cea14204107c535e34e66a26a8508170b249df1c93d8f396dd35c5d72664b12e6c365a5513fb176c7dc0a545b3c5130c8d991366b0a0e53d7ea3371680db661263a29a42bde5b780d2a04bf4167558df2d1ebc88a83a31b0febd84dc5a6a5be72b92b5739f404c0c14e810ce6bc8bf4e0252845264bed7a31a498f591e8d0af2a08861ae093058cf007ee991be612a9f4e3fffc27f8b1e27a2c481c7f4bef0650bd8932d20f303ffe3f846eFile filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ | ||
| .. highlight:: shell-session | ||
| .. _perf_profiling: | ||
| ============================================== | ||
| Python support for the Linux ``perf`` profiler | ||
| ============================================== | ||
| :author: Pablo Galindo | ||
| The Linux ``perf`` profiler is a very powerful tool that allows you to profile and | ||
| obtain information about the performance of your application. ``perf`` also has | ||
| a very vibrant ecosystem of tools that aid with the analysis of the data that it | ||
| produces. | ||
| The main problem with using the ``perf`` profiler with Python applications is that | ||
| ``perf`` only allows to get information about native symbols, this is, the names of | ||
| the functions and procedures written in C. This means that the names and file names | ||
| of the Python functions in your code will not appear in the output of the ``perf``. | ||
| Since Python 3.12, the interpreter can run in a special mode that allows Python | ||
| functions to appear in the output of the ``perf`` profiler. When this mode is | ||
| enabled, the interpreter will interpose a small piece of code compiled on the | ||
| fly before the execution of every Python function and it will teach ``perf`` the | ||
| relationship between this piece of code and the associated Python function using | ||
| `perf map files`_. | ||
| .. warning:: | ||
| Support for the ``perf`` profiler is only currently available for Linux on | ||
| selected architectures. Check the output of the configure build step or | ||
| check the output of ``python -m sysconfig | grep HAVE_PERF_TRAMPOLINE`` | ||
| to see if your system is supported. | ||
| For example, consider the following script: | ||
| .. code-block:: python | ||
| def foo(n): | ||
| result = 0 | ||
| for _ in range(n): | ||
| result += 1 | ||
| return result | ||
| def bar(n): | ||
| foo(n) | ||
| def baz(n): | ||
| bar(n) | ||
| if __name__ == "__main__": | ||
| baz(1000000) | ||
| We can run perf to sample CPU stack traces at 9999 Hertz: | ||
| $ perf record -F 9999 -g -o perf.data python my_script.py | ||
| Then we can use perf report to analyze the data: | ||
| .. code-block:: shell-session | ||
| $ perf report --stdio -n -g | ||
| # Children Self Samples Command Shared Object Symbol | ||
| # ........ ........ ............ .......... .................. .......................................... | ||
| # | ||
| 91.08% 0.00% 0 python.exe python.exe [.] _start | ||
| | | ||
| ---_start | ||
| | | ||
| --90.71%--__libc_start_main | ||
| Py_BytesMain | ||
| | | ||
| |--56.88%--pymain_run_python.constprop.0 | ||
| | | | ||
| | |--56.13%--_PyRun_AnyFileObject | ||
| | | _PyRun_SimpleFileObject | ||
| | | | | ||
| | | |--55.02%--run_mod | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | --54.65%--PyEval_EvalCode | ||
| | | | _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault | ||
| | | | PyObject_Vectorcall | ||
| | | | _PyEval_Vector | ||
| | | | _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault | ||
| | | | PyObject_Vectorcall | ||
| | | | _PyEval_Vector | ||
| | | | _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault | ||
| | | | PyObject_Vectorcall | ||
| | | | _PyEval_Vector | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | |--51.67%--_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault | ||
| | | | | | | ||
| | | | | |--11.52%--_PyLong_Add | ||
| | | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | |--2.97%--_PyObject_Malloc | ||
| ... | ||
| As you can see here, the Python functions are not shown in the output, only ``_Py_Eval_EvalFrameDefault`` appears | ||
| (the function that evaluates the Python bytecode) shows up. Unfortunately that's not very useful because all Python | ||
| functions use the same C function to evaluate bytecode so we cannot know which Python function corresponds to which | ||
| bytecode-evaluating function. | ||
| Instead, if we run the same experiment with perf support activated we get: | ||
| .. code-block:: shell-session | ||
| $ perf report --stdio -n -g | ||
| # Children Self Samples Command Shared Object Symbol | ||
| # ........ ........ ............ .......... .................. ..................................................................... | ||
| # | ||
| 90.58% 0.36% 1 python.exe python.exe [.] _start | ||
| | | ||
| ---_start | ||
| | | ||
| --89.86%--__libc_start_main | ||
| Py_BytesMain | ||
| | | ||
| |--55.43%--pymain_run_python.constprop.0 | ||
| | | | ||
| | |--54.71%--_PyRun_AnyFileObject | ||
| | | _PyRun_SimpleFileObject | ||
| | | | | ||
| | | |--53.62%--run_mod | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | --53.26%--PyEval_EvalCode | ||
| | | | py::<module>:/src/script.py | ||
| | | | _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault | ||
| | | | PyObject_Vectorcall | ||
| | | | _PyEval_Vector | ||
| | | | py::baz:/src/script.py | ||
| | | | _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault | ||
| | | | PyObject_Vectorcall | ||
| | | | _PyEval_Vector | ||
| | | | py::bar:/src/script.py | ||
| | | | _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault | ||
| | | | PyObject_Vectorcall | ||
| | | | _PyEval_Vector | ||
| | | | py::foo:/src/script.py | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | |--51.81%--_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault | ||
| | | | | | | ||
| | | | | |--13.77%--_PyLong_Add | ||
| | | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | |--3.26%--_PyObject_Malloc | ||
| Enabling perf profiling mode | ||
| ---------------------------- | ||
| There are two main ways to activate the perf profiling mode. If you want it to be | ||
| active since the start of the Python interpreter, you can use the `-Xperf` option: | ||
| $ python -Xperf my_script.py | ||
| There is also support for dynamically activating and deactivating the perf | ||
| profiling mode by using the APIs in the :mod:`sys` module: | ||
| .. code-block:: python | ||
| import sys | ||
| sys.activate_stack_trampoline("perf") | ||
| # Run some code with Perf profiling active | ||
| sys.deactivate_stack_trampoline() | ||
| # Perf profiling is not active anymore | ||
| These APIs can be handy if you want to activate/deactivate profiling mode in | ||
| response to a signal or other communication mechanism with your process. | ||
pablogsal marked this conversation as resolved.
Uh oh!There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. | ||
| Now we can analyze the data with ``perf report``: | ||
| $ perf report -g -i perf.data | ||
| How to obtain the best results | ||
| ------------------------------- | ||
| For the best results, Python should be compiled with | ||
| ``CFLAGS="-fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer"`` as this allows | ||
| profilers to unwind using only the frame pointer and not on DWARF debug | ||
| information. This is because as the code that is interposed to allow perf | ||
| support is dynamically generated it doesn't have any DWARF debugging information | ||
| available. | ||
| You can check if you system has been compiled with this flag by running: | ||
| $ python -m sysconfig | grep 'no-omit-frame-pointer' | ||
| If you don't see any output it means that your interpreter has not been compiled with | ||
| frame pointers and therefore it may not be able to show Python functions in the output | ||
| of ``perf``. | ||
| .. _perf map files: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/0513e464f9007b70b96740271a948ca5ab6e7dd7/tools/perf/Documentation/jit-interface.txt | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -535,6 +535,12 @@ Miscellaneous options | ||
| development (running from the source tree) then the default is "off". | ||
| Note that the "importlib_bootstrap" and "importlib_bootstrap_external" | ||
| frozen modules are always used, even if this flag is set to "off". | ||
| * ``-X perf`` to activate compatibility mode with the ``perf`` profiler. | ||
| When this option is activated, the Linux ``perf`` profiler will be able to | ||
| report Python calls. This option is only available on some platforms and | ||
| will do nothing if is not supported on the current system. The default value | ||
| is "off". See also :envvar:`PYTHONPERFSUPPORT` and :ref:`perf_profiling` | ||
| for more information. | ||
pablogsal marked this conversation as resolved.
Uh oh!There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. | ||
| It also allows passing arbitrary values and retrieving them through the | ||
| :data:`sys._xoptions` dictionary. | ||
| @@ -1025,6 +1031,13 @@ conflict. | ||
| .. versionadded:: 3.11 | ||
| .. envvar:: PYTHONPERFSUPPORT | ||
| If this variable is set to a nonzero value, it activates compatibility mode | ||
| with the ``perf`` profiler so Python calls can be detected by it. See the | ||
| :ref:`perf_profiling` section for more information. | ||
| .. versionadded:: 3.12 | ||
| Debug-mode variables | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.