Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't like the false sense of security this gives us, this comment makes this seem fail-safe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a copy-paste from python/cpython#141866 which references https://blog.yossarian.net/2025/11/21/We-should-all-be-using-dependency-cooldowns.
Nothing is fail-safe in security, there are many things we can do to protect against these attacks, and this is a good one. They layer on top of each other.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, I find the comment additionally misleading. I suggest either:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's ask @gpshead who wrote the comment and @woodruffw who wrote the blog post.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dependency cooldowns are not a false sense of security. most supply chain attacks are found and fixed and yanked from the upstream package distribution ecosystems within a few days. I don't think we should block this PR on wanting the comment better, but we should apply any edit making it better to all places we've added this.
dependabot defaults to not having a cooldown - https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/reference/supply-chain-security/dependabot-options-reference#cooldown- - this is simply how we enable the good thing. (it'd be great if they changed their default in light of the modern world, but that's not our problem to solve)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I’d like to clarify that I’m not against cooldowns (in fact, I support the idea). However, Dependabots implementation is poor, and any threat actor can easily circumvent it (dependabot/dependabot-core#13078).