Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
PEP 1: Update language on PEP-Delegate field#2256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -281,14 +281,25 @@ notifying the PEP author(s) and giving them a chance to make revisions. | ||||||||||||||||
| The final authority for PEP approval is the Steering Council. However, whenever | ||||||||||||||||
| a new PEP is put forward, any core developer that believes they are suitably | ||||||||||||||||
| experienced to make the final decision on that PEP may offer to serve as | ||||||||||||||||
| the PEP-Delegate for that PEP, and they will then have the authority to approve | ||||||||||||||||
| (or reject) that PEP. Individuals taking on this responsibility are free to seek | ||||||||||||||||
| the PEP-Delegate for that PEP, and they will then have the | ||||||||||||||||
| authority to approve (or reject) that PEP. | ||||||||||||||||
| The term "PEP-Delegate" is used under the Steering | ||||||||||||||||
| Council governance model. The PEP's designated decision maker, | ||||||||||||||||
| the "PEP-Delegate" with the Steering Council's support, is | ||||||||||||||||
| recorded in the "PEP-Delegate" field in the PEP's header. For | ||||||||||||||||
Comment on lines
+287
to
+290
Member There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
I found the wording here a little choppy, redundant and hard to parse, and suggest a bit of a restructuring to improve this. | ||||||||||||||||
| PEPs written prior to the Steering Council's governance model, the field name | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| PEPs written prior to the Steering Council's governance model, the field name | |
| PEPs written prior to the Steering Council governance model, the field name |
Nitpick, but the possessive implies that the Steering Council created the governance model, as opposed to itself being the name of the governance model itself
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| The terms PEP-Delegate and BDFL-Delegate may be used interchangeably in | |
| discussion. PEP-Delegate is the preferred term under the Steering Council | |
| governance model. | |
| The term "BDFL-Delegate" is a legacy alias for PEP-Delegate, stemming from | |
| the time when Python was led by a BDFL, but otherwise has the same meaning. |
This emphasizes that BDFL-Delegate is a legacy alias and explains its origin, while being simpler and more direct and with less choppiness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| Individuals taking on this responsibility are free to seek | |
| Those taking on this responsibility are free to seek |
Avoid repetition
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if this is the proper wording, but I would be explicit here to clarify that the SC has to approve their offer, it isn't automatic upon offering (as the text here seems to imply).