Bug report
Bug description:
The create_aggregate documentation does not specify a result type of the aggregation and even allows for multiple aggregating values per row (n_arg parameter).
However, the type declaration at dbapi2.pyi does not reflect that (comments added by me):
defcreate_aggregate(self, name: str, n_arg: int, aggregate_class: Callable[[], _AggregateProtocol]) ->None: ...
class_AggregateProtocol(Protocol):
defstep(self, value: int, /) ->object: ... # <-- just one aggregating value of type intdeffinalize(self) ->int: ... # <-- result has to be int
I think that this is not correct. At least, I have working code that aggregates multiple strings into a combined one.
Also, it is in stark contrast to other, way more generic, type declarations at the same place (comments added by me):
class_AnyParamWindowAggregateClass(Protocol):
defstep(self, *args: Any) ->object: ... # <-- multiple aggregating values of any type alloweddefinverse(self, *args: Any) ->object: ...
defvalue(self) ->_SqliteData: ...
deffinalize(self) ->_SqliteData: ... # <-- result can be many more types_SqliteData: TypeAlias=str|ReadableBuffer|int|float|None
CPython versions tested on:
3.12
Operating systems tested on:
Windows
Bug report
Bug description:
The create_aggregate documentation does not specify a result type of the aggregation and even allows for multiple aggregating values per row (
n_argparameter).However, the type declaration at
dbapi2.pyidoes not reflect that (comments added by me):I think that this is not correct. At least, I have working code that aggregates multiple strings into a combined one.
Also, it is in stark contrast to other, way more generic, type declarations at the same place (comments added by me):
CPython versions tested on:
3.12
Operating systems tested on:
Windows