Skip to content

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities - #420

Open
anaconda-security-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-984a906c1792e228b71ff5aa55b82b98
Open

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities#420
anaconda-security-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-984a906c1792e228b71ff5aa55b82b98

Conversation

@anaconda-security-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/tree/package.json

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

⚠️Warning
Failed to update the yarn.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

IssueScore
medium severityDirectory Traversal
SNYK-JS-POSTCSS-18512282
738

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: High

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note:You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Directory Traversal

@anaconda-security-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Merge Risk: High

This set of upgrades includes a major and high-risk architectural change to @jupyter-notebook/application, which is now based on JupyterLab components. The other upgrades are minor stabilizations.

High Risk

@jupyter-notebook/application from 0.0.0-use.local to 7.0.0
This is a significant major version upgrade that re-builds the Jupyter Notebook application on top of JupyterLab components. While the classic document-centric user experience is preserved, the underlying technology is completely different.

Breaking Changes:

  • New Architecture: The application is now based on JupyterLab 4.0, inheriting its features and extension system.
  • Extension Incompatibility: Classic Notebook v6 extensions are not compatible with Notebook 7. You must migrate to JupyterLab-compatible extensions.
  • New Features: This version introduces many features previously available only in JupyterLab, such as a visual debugger, real-time collaboration, a table of contents, and theming with dark mode.

Recommendation: A full migration and testing plan is required. Verify that all necessary extensions have a compatible version for JupyterLab 4 / Notebook 7. Treat this as a major application migration.

Medium Risk

@jupyterlab/apputils from 4.6.0-alpha.3 to 4.6.0
This upgrade moves from a pre-release to a stable version. While typically consisting of bug fixes, final releases can include API adjustments not present in the alpha. The migration guide for this version range also notes a significant change for extension developers, replacing @jupyterlab/builder with @jupyter/builder for building extensions. The risk is medium due to potential final API changes and the notable build system update.

Low Risk

@jupyterlab/mainmenu from 4.5.0-alpha.3 to 4.5.0
This is a stabilization release from a pre-release to a final version. Changes primarily consist of bug fixes and minor enhancements, such as UI adjustments to menus and keyboard shortcuts. No breaking API changes are documented.

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@anaconda-security-bot@snyk-bot