Nested workflows with AiiDA - #145

Draft
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Draft

Nested workflows with AiiDA#145
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida

Conversation

@GeigerJ2

@GeigerJ2GeigerJ2 commented Oct 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@JaGeo

JaGeo commented Oct 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.

@GeigerJ2

GeigerJ2 commented Oct 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.

Yes, fully agree! The current one is a bit pointless, as the outer graph just wraps the inputs/outputs but adds zero logic. I should have a working version of the load_workflow_json now, so I'm happy to extend the workflow. We can touch base on this once we arrive at the workshop 🙏🏽

@GeigerJ2

GeigerJ2 commented Oct 24, 2025•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@JaGeo an example with additional pre- and post-processing around the inner graph:

{
"version": "0.1.1",
"nodes": [
{ "id": 0, "value": 3, "type": "input", "name": "a" },
{ "id": 1, "value": 2, "type": "input", "name": "b" },
{ "id": 2, "value": 4, "type": "input", "name": "c" },
{ "id": 3, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_prod_and_div" },
{ "id": 4, "type": "workflow", "value": "prod_div.json" },
{ "id": 5, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_sum" },
{ "id": 6, "type": "output", "name": "final_result" }
],
"edges": [
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "x", "source": 0, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "y", "source": 2, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "x", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "prod" },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "y", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "div" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "x", "source": 4, "sourcePort": "result" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "y", "source": 1, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 6, "targetPort": null, "source": 5, "sourcePort": null }
]
}
{BA0AFF8C-07DC-406E-88D3-2FB9D1768C82}

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@GeigerJ2@JaGeo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Nested workflows with AiiDA - #145
Draft
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Draft
Nested workflows with AiiDA#145
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Conversation
@GeigerJ2
@GeigerJ2GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@JaGeo
JaGeo
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
Yes, fully agree! The current one is a bit pointless, as the outer graph just wraps the inputs/outputs but adds zero logic. I should have a working version of the load_workflow_json now, so I'm happy to extend the workflow. We can touch base on this once we arrive at the workshop 🙏🏽
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@JaGeo an example with additional pre- and post-processing around the inner graph:
{
"version": "0.1.1",
"nodes": [
{ "id": 0, "value": 3, "type": "input", "name": "a" },
{ "id": 1, "value": 2, "type": "input", "name": "b" },
{ "id": 2, "value": 4, "type": "input", "name": "c" },
{ "id": 3, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_prod_and_div" },
{ "id": 4, "type": "workflow", "value": "prod_div.json" },
{ "id": 5, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_sum" },
{ "id": 6, "type": "output", "name": "final_result" }
],
"edges": [
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "x", "source": 0, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "y", "source": 2, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "x", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "prod" },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "y", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "div" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "x", "source": 4, "sourcePort": "result" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "y", "source": 1, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 6, "targetPort": null, "source": 5, "sourcePort": null }
]
}
{BA0AFF8C-07DC-406E-88D3-2FB9D1768C82}
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@GeigerJ2@JaGeo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Nested workflows with AiiDA - #145
Draft
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Draft
Nested workflows with AiiDA#145
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Conversation
@GeigerJ2
@GeigerJ2GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@JaGeo
JaGeo
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
Yes, fully agree! The current one is a bit pointless, as the outer graph just wraps the inputs/outputs but adds zero logic. I should have a working version of the load_workflow_json now, so I'm happy to extend the workflow. We can touch base on this once we arrive at the workshop 🙏🏽
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@JaGeo an example with additional pre- and post-processing around the inner graph:
{
"version": "0.1.1",
"nodes": [
{ "id": 0, "value": 3, "type": "input", "name": "a" },
{ "id": 1, "value": 2, "type": "input", "name": "b" },
{ "id": 2, "value": 4, "type": "input", "name": "c" },
{ "id": 3, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_prod_and_div" },
{ "id": 4, "type": "workflow", "value": "prod_div.json" },
{ "id": 5, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_sum" },
{ "id": 6, "type": "output", "name": "final_result" }
],
"edges": [
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "x", "source": 0, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "y", "source": 2, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "x", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "prod" },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "y", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "div" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "x", "source": 4, "sourcePort": "result" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "y", "source": 1, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 6, "targetPort": null, "source": 5, "sourcePort": null }
]
}
{BA0AFF8C-07DC-406E-88D3-2FB9D1768C82}
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@GeigerJ2@JaGeo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Nested workflows with AiiDA - #145
Draft
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Draft
Nested workflows with AiiDA#145
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Conversation
@GeigerJ2
@GeigerJ2GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@JaGeo
JaGeo
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
Yes, fully agree! The current one is a bit pointless, as the outer graph just wraps the inputs/outputs but adds zero logic. I should have a working version of the load_workflow_json now, so I'm happy to extend the workflow. We can touch base on this once we arrive at the workshop 🙏🏽
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@JaGeo an example with additional pre- and post-processing around the inner graph:
{
"version": "0.1.1",
"nodes": [
{ "id": 0, "value": 3, "type": "input", "name": "a" },
{ "id": 1, "value": 2, "type": "input", "name": "b" },
{ "id": 2, "value": 4, "type": "input", "name": "c" },
{ "id": 3, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_prod_and_div" },
{ "id": 4, "type": "workflow", "value": "prod_div.json" },
{ "id": 5, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_sum" },
{ "id": 6, "type": "output", "name": "final_result" }
],
"edges": [
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "x", "source": 0, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "y", "source": 2, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "x", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "prod" },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "y", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "div" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "x", "source": 4, "sourcePort": "result" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "y", "source": 1, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 6, "targetPort": null, "source": 5, "sourcePort": null }
]
}
{BA0AFF8C-07DC-406E-88D3-2FB9D1768C82}
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@GeigerJ2@JaGeo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Nested workflows with AiiDA - #145
Draft
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Draft
Nested workflows with AiiDA#145
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Conversation
@GeigerJ2
@GeigerJ2GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@JaGeo
JaGeo
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
Yes, fully agree! The current one is a bit pointless, as the outer graph just wraps the inputs/outputs but adds zero logic. I should have a working version of the load_workflow_json now, so I'm happy to extend the workflow. We can touch base on this once we arrive at the workshop 🙏🏽
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@JaGeo an example with additional pre- and post-processing around the inner graph:
{
"version": "0.1.1",
"nodes": [
{ "id": 0, "value": 3, "type": "input", "name": "a" },
{ "id": 1, "value": 2, "type": "input", "name": "b" },
{ "id": 2, "value": 4, "type": "input", "name": "c" },
{ "id": 3, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_prod_and_div" },
{ "id": 4, "type": "workflow", "value": "prod_div.json" },
{ "id": 5, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_sum" },
{ "id": 6, "type": "output", "name": "final_result" }
],
"edges": [
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "x", "source": 0, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "y", "source": 2, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "x", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "prod" },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "y", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "div" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "x", "source": 4, "sourcePort": "result" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "y", "source": 1, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 6, "targetPort": null, "source": 5, "sourcePort": null }
]
}
{BA0AFF8C-07DC-406E-88D3-2FB9D1768C82}
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@GeigerJ2@JaGeo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Nested workflows with AiiDA - #145
Draft
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Draft
Nested workflows with AiiDA#145
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Conversation
@GeigerJ2
@GeigerJ2GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@JaGeo
JaGeo
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
Yes, fully agree! The current one is a bit pointless, as the outer graph just wraps the inputs/outputs but adds zero logic. I should have a working version of the load_workflow_json now, so I'm happy to extend the workflow. We can touch base on this once we arrive at the workshop 🙏🏽
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@JaGeo an example with additional pre- and post-processing around the inner graph:
{
"version": "0.1.1",
"nodes": [
{ "id": 0, "value": 3, "type": "input", "name": "a" },
{ "id": 1, "value": 2, "type": "input", "name": "b" },
{ "id": 2, "value": 4, "type": "input", "name": "c" },
{ "id": 3, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_prod_and_div" },
{ "id": 4, "type": "workflow", "value": "prod_div.json" },
{ "id": 5, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_sum" },
{ "id": 6, "type": "output", "name": "final_result" }
],
"edges": [
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "x", "source": 0, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "y", "source": 2, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "x", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "prod" },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "y", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "div" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "x", "source": 4, "sourcePort": "result" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "y", "source": 1, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 6, "targetPort": null, "source": 5, "sourcePort": null }
]
}
{BA0AFF8C-07DC-406E-88D3-2FB9D1768C82}
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@GeigerJ2@JaGeo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Nested workflows with AiiDA - #145
Draft
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Draft
Nested workflows with AiiDA#145
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Conversation
@GeigerJ2
@GeigerJ2GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@JaGeo
JaGeo
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
Yes, fully agree! The current one is a bit pointless, as the outer graph just wraps the inputs/outputs but adds zero logic. I should have a working version of the load_workflow_json now, so I'm happy to extend the workflow. We can touch base on this once we arrive at the workshop 🙏🏽
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@JaGeo an example with additional pre- and post-processing around the inner graph:
{
"version": "0.1.1",
"nodes": [
{ "id": 0, "value": 3, "type": "input", "name": "a" },
{ "id": 1, "value": 2, "type": "input", "name": "b" },
{ "id": 2, "value": 4, "type": "input", "name": "c" },
{ "id": 3, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_prod_and_div" },
{ "id": 4, "type": "workflow", "value": "prod_div.json" },
{ "id": 5, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_sum" },
{ "id": 6, "type": "output", "name": "final_result" }
],
"edges": [
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "x", "source": 0, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "y", "source": 2, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "x", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "prod" },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "y", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "div" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "x", "source": 4, "sourcePort": "result" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "y", "source": 1, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 6, "targetPort": null, "source": 5, "sourcePort": null }
]
}
{BA0AFF8C-07DC-406E-88D3-2FB9D1768C82}
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@GeigerJ2@JaGeo

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Nested workflows with AiiDA - #145
Draft
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Draft
Nested workflows with AiiDA#145
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 12 commits into
pythonworkflow:mainfrom 
GeigerJ2:nested-aiida
Conversation
@GeigerJ2
@GeigerJ2GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
 No description provided. 
@JaGeo
JaGeo
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@GeigerJ2 I am wondering if ee can construct a more advanced example with two nested flows or a nested one combined with a function. This would help me a lot to debug my code.
Yes, fully agree! The current one is a bit pointless, as the outer graph just wraps the inputs/outputs but adds zero logic. I should have a working version of the load_workflow_json now, so I'm happy to extend the workflow. We can touch base on this once we arrive at the workshop 🙏🏽
@GeigerJ2
GeigerJ2
commented
Oct 24, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

CollaboratorAuthor
@JaGeo an example with additional pre- and post-processing around the inner graph:
{
"version": "0.1.1",
"nodes": [
{ "id": 0, "value": 3, "type": "input", "name": "a" },
{ "id": 1, "value": 2, "type": "input", "name": "b" },
{ "id": 2, "value": 4, "type": "input", "name": "c" },
{ "id": 3, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_prod_and_div" },
{ "id": 4, "type": "workflow", "value": "prod_div.json" },
{ "id": 5, "type": "function", "value": "workflow.get_sum" },
{ "id": 6, "type": "output", "name": "final_result" }
],
"edges": [
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "x", "source": 0, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 3, "targetPort": "y", "source": 2, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "x", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "prod" },
{ "target": 4, "targetPort": "y", "source": 3, "sourcePort": "div" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "x", "source": 4, "sourcePort": "result" },
{ "target": 5, "targetPort": "y", "source": 1, "sourcePort": null },
{ "target": 6, "targetPort": null, "source": 5, "sourcePort": null }
]
}
{BA0AFF8C-07DC-406E-88D3-2FB9D1768C82}
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@GeigerJ2@JaGeo