fix bug with sequential backends - #10708

Merged
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258
May 9, 2025
Merged

fix bug with sequential backends#10708
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258

Conversation

@mcr229

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706

there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec

Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate

Differential Revision: D74226258

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented May 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10708

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 4fab7c2 with merge base e196b50 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 6, 2025
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 118f575 to 05607b0CompareMay 6, 2025 19:08
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10708https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 05607b0 to 7bc4d70CompareMay 6, 2025 19:11
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 7bc4d70 to 4fab7c2CompareMay 6, 2025 19:18
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

@facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot merged commit bf50527 into pytorch:mainMay 9, 2025
@mcr229
mcr229 deleted the export-D74226258 branch July 25, 2025 22:42
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.fb-exportedtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@GregoryComer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix bug with sequential backends - #10708

Merged
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258
May 9, 2025
Merged

fix bug with sequential backends#10708
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258

Conversation

@mcr229

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706

there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec

Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate

Differential Revision: D74226258

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented May 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10708

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 4fab7c2 with merge base e196b50 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 6, 2025
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 118f575 to 05607b0CompareMay 6, 2025 19:08
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10708https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 05607b0 to 7bc4d70CompareMay 6, 2025 19:11
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 7bc4d70 to 4fab7c2CompareMay 6, 2025 19:18
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

@facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot merged commit bf50527 into pytorch:mainMay 9, 2025
@mcr229
mcr229 deleted the export-D74226258 branch July 25, 2025 22:42
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.fb-exportedtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@GregoryComer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix bug with sequential backends - #10708

Merged
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258
May 9, 2025
Merged

fix bug with sequential backends#10708
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258

Conversation

@mcr229

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706

there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec

Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate

Differential Revision: D74226258

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented May 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10708

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 4fab7c2 with merge base e196b50 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 6, 2025
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 118f575 to 05607b0CompareMay 6, 2025 19:08
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10708https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 05607b0 to 7bc4d70CompareMay 6, 2025 19:11
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 7bc4d70 to 4fab7c2CompareMay 6, 2025 19:18
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

@facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot merged commit bf50527 into pytorch:mainMay 9, 2025
@mcr229
mcr229 deleted the export-D74226258 branch July 25, 2025 22:42
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.fb-exportedtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@GregoryComer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix bug with sequential backends - #10708

Merged
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258
May 9, 2025
Merged

fix bug with sequential backends#10708
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258

Conversation

@mcr229

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706

there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec

Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate

Differential Revision: D74226258

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented May 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10708

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 4fab7c2 with merge base e196b50 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 6, 2025
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 118f575 to 05607b0CompareMay 6, 2025 19:08
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10708https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 05607b0 to 7bc4d70CompareMay 6, 2025 19:11
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 7bc4d70 to 4fab7c2CompareMay 6, 2025 19:18
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

@facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot merged commit bf50527 into pytorch:mainMay 9, 2025
@mcr229
mcr229 deleted the export-D74226258 branch July 25, 2025 22:42
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.fb-exportedtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@GregoryComer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix bug with sequential backends - #10708

Merged
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258
May 9, 2025
Merged

fix bug with sequential backends#10708
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258

Conversation

@mcr229

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706

there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec

Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate

Differential Revision: D74226258

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented May 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10708

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 4fab7c2 with merge base e196b50 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 6, 2025
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 118f575 to 05607b0CompareMay 6, 2025 19:08
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10708https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 05607b0 to 7bc4d70CompareMay 6, 2025 19:11
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 7bc4d70 to 4fab7c2CompareMay 6, 2025 19:18
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

@facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot merged commit bf50527 into pytorch:mainMay 9, 2025
@mcr229
mcr229 deleted the export-D74226258 branch July 25, 2025 22:42
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.fb-exportedtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@GregoryComer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix bug with sequential backends - #10708

Merged
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258
May 9, 2025
Merged

fix bug with sequential backends#10708
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258

Conversation

@mcr229

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706

there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec

Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate

Differential Revision: D74226258

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented May 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10708

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 4fab7c2 with merge base e196b50 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 6, 2025
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 118f575 to 05607b0CompareMay 6, 2025 19:08
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10708https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 05607b0 to 7bc4d70CompareMay 6, 2025 19:11
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 7bc4d70 to 4fab7c2CompareMay 6, 2025 19:18
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

@facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot merged commit bf50527 into pytorch:mainMay 9, 2025
@mcr229
mcr229 deleted the export-D74226258 branch July 25, 2025 22:42
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.fb-exportedtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@GregoryComer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix bug with sequential backends - #10708

Merged
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258
May 9, 2025
Merged

fix bug with sequential backends#10708
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258

Conversation

@mcr229

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706

there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec

Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate

Differential Revision: D74226258

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented May 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10708

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 4fab7c2 with merge base e196b50 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 6, 2025
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 118f575 to 05607b0CompareMay 6, 2025 19:08
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10708https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 05607b0 to 7bc4d70CompareMay 6, 2025 19:11
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 7bc4d70 to 4fab7c2CompareMay 6, 2025 19:18
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

@facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot merged commit bf50527 into pytorch:mainMay 9, 2025
@mcr229
mcr229 deleted the export-D74226258 branch July 25, 2025 22:42
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.fb-exportedtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@GregoryComer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix bug with sequential backends - #10708

Merged
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258
May 9, 2025
Merged

fix bug with sequential backends#10708
facebook-github-bot merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
mcr229:export-D74226258

Conversation

@mcr229

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706

there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec

Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate

Differential Revision: D74226258

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented May 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10708

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 4fab7c2 with merge base e196b50 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 6, 2025
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 118f575 to 05607b0CompareMay 6, 2025 19:08
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

mcr229 added a commit to mcr229/executorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10708https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 05607b0 to 7bc4d70CompareMay 6, 2025 19:11
Summary:
https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/10584/files#r2070213706
there's a bug described in this PR comment. I add some tests and a fix to cover it. Essentially when sequential partitions go through preprocess_all, the get_item nodes from the first partition in the sequence don't correctly get mapped to the arguments input into the second partition. This is because the name of these nodes change (the original node to a get_item node). Instead of checking for the names, we instead delete the nodes we know must be deleted from the inputspec
Additionaly, there is an issue with validation. the _validate fails when there are call_module nodes still in the graph. Since preprocess_multimethod will lower the call_submodule nodes one-by-one calling _validate before all the call_submodule nodes are transformed to call_delegate nodes will fail. We remove the _validate call from unsafe_adjust_original_program and instead call _validate on the original program after all the submodule nodes have been converted to call_delegate
Differential Revision: D74226258
@mcr229
mcr229force-pushed the export-D74226258 branch from 7bc4d70 to 4fab7c2CompareMay 6, 2025 19:18
@facebook-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74226258

@facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot merged commit bf50527 into pytorch:mainMay 9, 2025
@mcr229
mcr229 deleted the export-D74226258 branch July 25, 2025 22:42
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.fb-exportedtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@GregoryComer