[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm - #11805

Merged
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm
Jul 11, 2025
Merged

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm#11805
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm

Conversation

@keyprocedure

@keyprocedurekeyprocedure commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

These changes implement a fusion pass in the XNNPACK partitioner to support linear + batchnorm operations. This pass involves identifying and combining each linear node that exclusively precedes a batchnorm node in the Export IR graph. Fusion occurs by updating the linear node's weight and bias with a new fused weight and bias computed from the linear and batchnorm parameters. In the case of linear nodes without bias, the fused bias is added as a new parameter to the linear node. All users of the batchnorm output are then redirected to the fused linear node, and the batchnorm node is removed from the graph.

This linear + batchnorm pass follows the existing implementation pattern of the convolution + batchnorm pass. These fusion passes fold batchnorm into the preceding convolution or linear ops during export. This allows the XNNPACK backend to run a single fused operation at inference, reducing memory usage and latency without affecting model accuracy.

Note: The current linear + batchnorm fusion implementation supports FP32 only. Quantized support is planned for a future PR to TorchAO.

Fixes#11587

Test plan

Tests were added to verify that linear + batchnorm fusion occurs for FP32 models when the linear layer has a single user, and is skipped for linear layers with multiple users. Both linear cases, with and without bias, are tested. A separate test ensures that standalone batchnorm layers are not partitioned, since XNNPACK does not currently support them.

Tests run and passed via:
python -m unittest executorch.backends.xnnpack.test.passes.test_batch_norm_fusion

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11805

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 6c92d24 with merge base a8d7298 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 19, 2025
@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

@pytorch-botpytorch-botBot added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jun 19, 2025
Comment threadbackends/xnnpack/_passes/__init__.py Outdated
ConvertToSDPAPass,
ConstPropPass,
FuseBatchNormWithConvPass,
FuseBatchNormWithLinearPass,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome! Do you mind fusing these two passes? Something like BatchNormFusion pass? that way we can just generalize these?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call, combining the two passes cleaned up a lot of the duplication. Let me know if anything else needs to be changed.

@digantdesaidigantdesai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. LGTM. I will let Max stamp it.

@mcr229mcr229 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love this thank you!

@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Awesome, I'm glad!

Should we support fusion for Linear with bias=False as well? I can add it to this PR.

@digantdesai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@keyprocedure let us know once this is good to go. Me or @mcr229 can merge this. Also you might need to rebase, rerun ci.

@keyprocedure
keyprocedureforce-pushed the support-linear-fused-batchnorm branch from 98650e6 to 20afaa8CompareJuly 2, 2025 20:16
@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@digantdesai I added support for Linear with bias=False and rebased. Everything is good to go from my end - ready for CI. Thanks for reviewing and following up earlier!

@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The CI failures look unrelated to this PR. I noticed they were being discussed on Discord as known trunk issues. Just wanted to share in case it's helpful. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to update.

Here's a summary of the failures:

  • test-eval_llama-mmlu-linux: RuntimeError: Dataset scripts are no longer supported, but found mmlu_no_train.py
  • test-arm-cortex-m-size-test (bare_metal): size check failed in cmake-out/test/size_test
  • unittest-release (linux & macos): TensorPtrMakerTest.FailedCreateTensorUsingFromBlobWithIllegalStrides

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunkCLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.release notes: noneDo not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Linear Fused Batchnorm

5 participants

@keyprocedure@digantdesai@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@nil-is-all
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm - #11805

Merged
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm
Jul 11, 2025
Merged

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm#11805
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm

Conversation

@keyprocedure

@keyprocedurekeyprocedure commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

These changes implement a fusion pass in the XNNPACK partitioner to support linear + batchnorm operations. This pass involves identifying and combining each linear node that exclusively precedes a batchnorm node in the Export IR graph. Fusion occurs by updating the linear node's weight and bias with a new fused weight and bias computed from the linear and batchnorm parameters. In the case of linear nodes without bias, the fused bias is added as a new parameter to the linear node. All users of the batchnorm output are then redirected to the fused linear node, and the batchnorm node is removed from the graph.

This linear + batchnorm pass follows the existing implementation pattern of the convolution + batchnorm pass. These fusion passes fold batchnorm into the preceding convolution or linear ops during export. This allows the XNNPACK backend to run a single fused operation at inference, reducing memory usage and latency without affecting model accuracy.

Note: The current linear + batchnorm fusion implementation supports FP32 only. Quantized support is planned for a future PR to TorchAO.

Fixes#11587

Test plan

Tests were added to verify that linear + batchnorm fusion occurs for FP32 models when the linear layer has a single user, and is skipped for linear layers with multiple users. Both linear cases, with and without bias, are tested. A separate test ensures that standalone batchnorm layers are not partitioned, since XNNPACK does not currently support them.

Tests run and passed via:
python -m unittest executorch.backends.xnnpack.test.passes.test_batch_norm_fusion

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11805

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 6c92d24 with merge base a8d7298 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 19, 2025
@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

@pytorch-botpytorch-botBot added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jun 19, 2025
Comment threadbackends/xnnpack/_passes/__init__.py Outdated
ConvertToSDPAPass,
ConstPropPass,
FuseBatchNormWithConvPass,
FuseBatchNormWithLinearPass,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome! Do you mind fusing these two passes? Something like BatchNormFusion pass? that way we can just generalize these?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call, combining the two passes cleaned up a lot of the duplication. Let me know if anything else needs to be changed.

@digantdesaidigantdesai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. LGTM. I will let Max stamp it.

@mcr229mcr229 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love this thank you!

@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Awesome, I'm glad!

Should we support fusion for Linear with bias=False as well? I can add it to this PR.

@digantdesai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@keyprocedure let us know once this is good to go. Me or @mcr229 can merge this. Also you might need to rebase, rerun ci.

@keyprocedure
keyprocedureforce-pushed the support-linear-fused-batchnorm branch from 98650e6 to 20afaa8CompareJuly 2, 2025 20:16
@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@digantdesai I added support for Linear with bias=False and rebased. Everything is good to go from my end - ready for CI. Thanks for reviewing and following up earlier!

@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The CI failures look unrelated to this PR. I noticed they were being discussed on Discord as known trunk issues. Just wanted to share in case it's helpful. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to update.

Here's a summary of the failures:

  • test-eval_llama-mmlu-linux: RuntimeError: Dataset scripts are no longer supported, but found mmlu_no_train.py
  • test-arm-cortex-m-size-test (bare_metal): size check failed in cmake-out/test/size_test
  • unittest-release (linux & macos): TensorPtrMakerTest.FailedCreateTensorUsingFromBlobWithIllegalStrides

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunkCLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.release notes: noneDo not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Linear Fused Batchnorm

5 participants

@keyprocedure@digantdesai@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@nil-is-all
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm - #11805

Merged
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm
Jul 11, 2025
Merged

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm#11805
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm

Conversation

@keyprocedure

@keyprocedurekeyprocedure commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

These changes implement a fusion pass in the XNNPACK partitioner to support linear + batchnorm operations. This pass involves identifying and combining each linear node that exclusively precedes a batchnorm node in the Export IR graph. Fusion occurs by updating the linear node's weight and bias with a new fused weight and bias computed from the linear and batchnorm parameters. In the case of linear nodes without bias, the fused bias is added as a new parameter to the linear node. All users of the batchnorm output are then redirected to the fused linear node, and the batchnorm node is removed from the graph.

This linear + batchnorm pass follows the existing implementation pattern of the convolution + batchnorm pass. These fusion passes fold batchnorm into the preceding convolution or linear ops during export. This allows the XNNPACK backend to run a single fused operation at inference, reducing memory usage and latency without affecting model accuracy.

Note: The current linear + batchnorm fusion implementation supports FP32 only. Quantized support is planned for a future PR to TorchAO.

Fixes#11587

Test plan

Tests were added to verify that linear + batchnorm fusion occurs for FP32 models when the linear layer has a single user, and is skipped for linear layers with multiple users. Both linear cases, with and without bias, are tested. A separate test ensures that standalone batchnorm layers are not partitioned, since XNNPACK does not currently support them.

Tests run and passed via:
python -m unittest executorch.backends.xnnpack.test.passes.test_batch_norm_fusion

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11805

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 6c92d24 with merge base a8d7298 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 19, 2025
@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

@pytorch-botpytorch-botBot added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jun 19, 2025
Comment threadbackends/xnnpack/_passes/__init__.py Outdated
ConvertToSDPAPass,
ConstPropPass,
FuseBatchNormWithConvPass,
FuseBatchNormWithLinearPass,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome! Do you mind fusing these two passes? Something like BatchNormFusion pass? that way we can just generalize these?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call, combining the two passes cleaned up a lot of the duplication. Let me know if anything else needs to be changed.

@digantdesaidigantdesai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. LGTM. I will let Max stamp it.

@mcr229mcr229 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love this thank you!

@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Awesome, I'm glad!

Should we support fusion for Linear with bias=False as well? I can add it to this PR.

@digantdesai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@keyprocedure let us know once this is good to go. Me or @mcr229 can merge this. Also you might need to rebase, rerun ci.

@keyprocedure
keyprocedureforce-pushed the support-linear-fused-batchnorm branch from 98650e6 to 20afaa8CompareJuly 2, 2025 20:16
@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@digantdesai I added support for Linear with bias=False and rebased. Everything is good to go from my end - ready for CI. Thanks for reviewing and following up earlier!

@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The CI failures look unrelated to this PR. I noticed they were being discussed on Discord as known trunk issues. Just wanted to share in case it's helpful. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to update.

Here's a summary of the failures:

  • test-eval_llama-mmlu-linux: RuntimeError: Dataset scripts are no longer supported, but found mmlu_no_train.py
  • test-arm-cortex-m-size-test (bare_metal): size check failed in cmake-out/test/size_test
  • unittest-release (linux & macos): TensorPtrMakerTest.FailedCreateTensorUsingFromBlobWithIllegalStrides

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunkCLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.release notes: noneDo not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Linear Fused Batchnorm

5 participants

@keyprocedure@digantdesai@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@nil-is-all
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm - #11805

Merged
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm
Jul 11, 2025
Merged

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm#11805
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm

Conversation

@keyprocedure

@keyprocedurekeyprocedure commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

These changes implement a fusion pass in the XNNPACK partitioner to support linear + batchnorm operations. This pass involves identifying and combining each linear node that exclusively precedes a batchnorm node in the Export IR graph. Fusion occurs by updating the linear node's weight and bias with a new fused weight and bias computed from the linear and batchnorm parameters. In the case of linear nodes without bias, the fused bias is added as a new parameter to the linear node. All users of the batchnorm output are then redirected to the fused linear node, and the batchnorm node is removed from the graph.

This linear + batchnorm pass follows the existing implementation pattern of the convolution + batchnorm pass. These fusion passes fold batchnorm into the preceding convolution or linear ops during export. This allows the XNNPACK backend to run a single fused operation at inference, reducing memory usage and latency without affecting model accuracy.

Note: The current linear + batchnorm fusion implementation supports FP32 only. Quantized support is planned for a future PR to TorchAO.

Fixes#11587

Test plan

Tests were added to verify that linear + batchnorm fusion occurs for FP32 models when the linear layer has a single user, and is skipped for linear layers with multiple users. Both linear cases, with and without bias, are tested. A separate test ensures that standalone batchnorm layers are not partitioned, since XNNPACK does not currently support them.

Tests run and passed via:
python -m unittest executorch.backends.xnnpack.test.passes.test_batch_norm_fusion

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11805

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 6c92d24 with merge base a8d7298 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 19, 2025
@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

@pytorch-botpytorch-botBot added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jun 19, 2025
Comment threadbackends/xnnpack/_passes/__init__.py Outdated
ConvertToSDPAPass,
ConstPropPass,
FuseBatchNormWithConvPass,
FuseBatchNormWithLinearPass,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome! Do you mind fusing these two passes? Something like BatchNormFusion pass? that way we can just generalize these?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call, combining the two passes cleaned up a lot of the duplication. Let me know if anything else needs to be changed.

@digantdesaidigantdesai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. LGTM. I will let Max stamp it.

@mcr229mcr229 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love this thank you!

@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Awesome, I'm glad!

Should we support fusion for Linear with bias=False as well? I can add it to this PR.

@digantdesai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@keyprocedure let us know once this is good to go. Me or @mcr229 can merge this. Also you might need to rebase, rerun ci.

@keyprocedure
keyprocedureforce-pushed the support-linear-fused-batchnorm branch from 98650e6 to 20afaa8CompareJuly 2, 2025 20:16
@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@digantdesai I added support for Linear with bias=False and rebased. Everything is good to go from my end - ready for CI. Thanks for reviewing and following up earlier!

@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The CI failures look unrelated to this PR. I noticed they were being discussed on Discord as known trunk issues. Just wanted to share in case it's helpful. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to update.

Here's a summary of the failures:

  • test-eval_llama-mmlu-linux: RuntimeError: Dataset scripts are no longer supported, but found mmlu_no_train.py
  • test-arm-cortex-m-size-test (bare_metal): size check failed in cmake-out/test/size_test
  • unittest-release (linux & macos): TensorPtrMakerTest.FailedCreateTensorUsingFromBlobWithIllegalStrides

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunkCLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.release notes: noneDo not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Linear Fused Batchnorm

5 participants

@keyprocedure@digantdesai@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@nil-is-all
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm - #11805

Merged
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm
Jul 11, 2025
Merged

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm#11805
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm

Conversation

@keyprocedure

@keyprocedurekeyprocedure commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

These changes implement a fusion pass in the XNNPACK partitioner to support linear + batchnorm operations. This pass involves identifying and combining each linear node that exclusively precedes a batchnorm node in the Export IR graph. Fusion occurs by updating the linear node's weight and bias with a new fused weight and bias computed from the linear and batchnorm parameters. In the case of linear nodes without bias, the fused bias is added as a new parameter to the linear node. All users of the batchnorm output are then redirected to the fused linear node, and the batchnorm node is removed from the graph.

This linear + batchnorm pass follows the existing implementation pattern of the convolution + batchnorm pass. These fusion passes fold batchnorm into the preceding convolution or linear ops during export. This allows the XNNPACK backend to run a single fused operation at inference, reducing memory usage and latency without affecting model accuracy.

Note: The current linear + batchnorm fusion implementation supports FP32 only. Quantized support is planned for a future PR to TorchAO.

Fixes#11587

Test plan

Tests were added to verify that linear + batchnorm fusion occurs for FP32 models when the linear layer has a single user, and is skipped for linear layers with multiple users. Both linear cases, with and without bias, are tested. A separate test ensures that standalone batchnorm layers are not partitioned, since XNNPACK does not currently support them.

Tests run and passed via:
python -m unittest executorch.backends.xnnpack.test.passes.test_batch_norm_fusion

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11805

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 6c92d24 with merge base a8d7298 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 19, 2025
@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

@pytorch-botpytorch-botBot added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jun 19, 2025
Comment threadbackends/xnnpack/_passes/__init__.py Outdated
ConvertToSDPAPass,
ConstPropPass,
FuseBatchNormWithConvPass,
FuseBatchNormWithLinearPass,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome! Do you mind fusing these two passes? Something like BatchNormFusion pass? that way we can just generalize these?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call, combining the two passes cleaned up a lot of the duplication. Let me know if anything else needs to be changed.

@digantdesaidigantdesai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. LGTM. I will let Max stamp it.

@mcr229mcr229 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love this thank you!

@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Awesome, I'm glad!

Should we support fusion for Linear with bias=False as well? I can add it to this PR.

@digantdesai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@keyprocedure let us know once this is good to go. Me or @mcr229 can merge this. Also you might need to rebase, rerun ci.

@keyprocedure
keyprocedureforce-pushed the support-linear-fused-batchnorm branch from 98650e6 to 20afaa8CompareJuly 2, 2025 20:16
@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@digantdesai I added support for Linear with bias=False and rebased. Everything is good to go from my end - ready for CI. Thanks for reviewing and following up earlier!

@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The CI failures look unrelated to this PR. I noticed they were being discussed on Discord as known trunk issues. Just wanted to share in case it's helpful. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to update.

Here's a summary of the failures:

  • test-eval_llama-mmlu-linux: RuntimeError: Dataset scripts are no longer supported, but found mmlu_no_train.py
  • test-arm-cortex-m-size-test (bare_metal): size check failed in cmake-out/test/size_test
  • unittest-release (linux & macos): TensorPtrMakerTest.FailedCreateTensorUsingFromBlobWithIllegalStrides

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunkCLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.release notes: noneDo not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Linear Fused Batchnorm

5 participants

@keyprocedure@digantdesai@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@nil-is-all
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm - #11805

Merged
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm
Jul 11, 2025
Merged

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm#11805
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm

Conversation

@keyprocedure

@keyprocedurekeyprocedure commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

These changes implement a fusion pass in the XNNPACK partitioner to support linear + batchnorm operations. This pass involves identifying and combining each linear node that exclusively precedes a batchnorm node in the Export IR graph. Fusion occurs by updating the linear node's weight and bias with a new fused weight and bias computed from the linear and batchnorm parameters. In the case of linear nodes without bias, the fused bias is added as a new parameter to the linear node. All users of the batchnorm output are then redirected to the fused linear node, and the batchnorm node is removed from the graph.

This linear + batchnorm pass follows the existing implementation pattern of the convolution + batchnorm pass. These fusion passes fold batchnorm into the preceding convolution or linear ops during export. This allows the XNNPACK backend to run a single fused operation at inference, reducing memory usage and latency without affecting model accuracy.

Note: The current linear + batchnorm fusion implementation supports FP32 only. Quantized support is planned for a future PR to TorchAO.

Fixes#11587

Test plan

Tests were added to verify that linear + batchnorm fusion occurs for FP32 models when the linear layer has a single user, and is skipped for linear layers with multiple users. Both linear cases, with and without bias, are tested. A separate test ensures that standalone batchnorm layers are not partitioned, since XNNPACK does not currently support them.

Tests run and passed via:
python -m unittest executorch.backends.xnnpack.test.passes.test_batch_norm_fusion

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11805

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 6c92d24 with merge base a8d7298 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 19, 2025
@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

@pytorch-botpytorch-botBot added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jun 19, 2025
Comment threadbackends/xnnpack/_passes/__init__.py Outdated
ConvertToSDPAPass,
ConstPropPass,
FuseBatchNormWithConvPass,
FuseBatchNormWithLinearPass,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome! Do you mind fusing these two passes? Something like BatchNormFusion pass? that way we can just generalize these?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call, combining the two passes cleaned up a lot of the duplication. Let me know if anything else needs to be changed.

@digantdesaidigantdesai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. LGTM. I will let Max stamp it.

@mcr229mcr229 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love this thank you!

@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Awesome, I'm glad!

Should we support fusion for Linear with bias=False as well? I can add it to this PR.

@digantdesai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@keyprocedure let us know once this is good to go. Me or @mcr229 can merge this. Also you might need to rebase, rerun ci.

@keyprocedure
keyprocedureforce-pushed the support-linear-fused-batchnorm branch from 98650e6 to 20afaa8CompareJuly 2, 2025 20:16
@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@digantdesai I added support for Linear with bias=False and rebased. Everything is good to go from my end - ready for CI. Thanks for reviewing and following up earlier!

@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The CI failures look unrelated to this PR. I noticed they were being discussed on Discord as known trunk issues. Just wanted to share in case it's helpful. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to update.

Here's a summary of the failures:

  • test-eval_llama-mmlu-linux: RuntimeError: Dataset scripts are no longer supported, but found mmlu_no_train.py
  • test-arm-cortex-m-size-test (bare_metal): size check failed in cmake-out/test/size_test
  • unittest-release (linux & macos): TensorPtrMakerTest.FailedCreateTensorUsingFromBlobWithIllegalStrides

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunkCLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.release notes: noneDo not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Linear Fused Batchnorm

5 participants

@keyprocedure@digantdesai@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@nil-is-all
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm - #11805

Merged
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm
Jul 11, 2025
Merged

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm#11805
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm

Conversation

@keyprocedure

@keyprocedurekeyprocedure commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

These changes implement a fusion pass in the XNNPACK partitioner to support linear + batchnorm operations. This pass involves identifying and combining each linear node that exclusively precedes a batchnorm node in the Export IR graph. Fusion occurs by updating the linear node's weight and bias with a new fused weight and bias computed from the linear and batchnorm parameters. In the case of linear nodes without bias, the fused bias is added as a new parameter to the linear node. All users of the batchnorm output are then redirected to the fused linear node, and the batchnorm node is removed from the graph.

This linear + batchnorm pass follows the existing implementation pattern of the convolution + batchnorm pass. These fusion passes fold batchnorm into the preceding convolution or linear ops during export. This allows the XNNPACK backend to run a single fused operation at inference, reducing memory usage and latency without affecting model accuracy.

Note: The current linear + batchnorm fusion implementation supports FP32 only. Quantized support is planned for a future PR to TorchAO.

Fixes#11587

Test plan

Tests were added to verify that linear + batchnorm fusion occurs for FP32 models when the linear layer has a single user, and is skipped for linear layers with multiple users. Both linear cases, with and without bias, are tested. A separate test ensures that standalone batchnorm layers are not partitioned, since XNNPACK does not currently support them.

Tests run and passed via:
python -m unittest executorch.backends.xnnpack.test.passes.test_batch_norm_fusion

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11805

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 6c92d24 with merge base a8d7298 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 19, 2025
@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

@pytorch-botpytorch-botBot added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jun 19, 2025
Comment threadbackends/xnnpack/_passes/__init__.py Outdated
ConvertToSDPAPass,
ConstPropPass,
FuseBatchNormWithConvPass,
FuseBatchNormWithLinearPass,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome! Do you mind fusing these two passes? Something like BatchNormFusion pass? that way we can just generalize these?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call, combining the two passes cleaned up a lot of the duplication. Let me know if anything else needs to be changed.

@digantdesaidigantdesai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. LGTM. I will let Max stamp it.

@mcr229mcr229 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love this thank you!

@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Awesome, I'm glad!

Should we support fusion for Linear with bias=False as well? I can add it to this PR.

@digantdesai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@keyprocedure let us know once this is good to go. Me or @mcr229 can merge this. Also you might need to rebase, rerun ci.

@keyprocedure
keyprocedureforce-pushed the support-linear-fused-batchnorm branch from 98650e6 to 20afaa8CompareJuly 2, 2025 20:16
@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@digantdesai I added support for Linear with bias=False and rebased. Everything is good to go from my end - ready for CI. Thanks for reviewing and following up earlier!

@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The CI failures look unrelated to this PR. I noticed they were being discussed on Discord as known trunk issues. Just wanted to share in case it's helpful. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to update.

Here's a summary of the failures:

  • test-eval_llama-mmlu-linux: RuntimeError: Dataset scripts are no longer supported, but found mmlu_no_train.py
  • test-arm-cortex-m-size-test (bare_metal): size check failed in cmake-out/test/size_test
  • unittest-release (linux & macos): TensorPtrMakerTest.FailedCreateTensorUsingFromBlobWithIllegalStrides

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunkCLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.release notes: noneDo not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Linear Fused Batchnorm

5 participants

@keyprocedure@digantdesai@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@nil-is-all
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm - #11805

Merged
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm
Jul 11, 2025
Merged

[XNNPACK] Add support for Linear fused BatchNorm#11805
digantdesai merged 8 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
keyprocedure:support-linear-fused-batchnorm

Conversation

@keyprocedure

@keyprocedurekeyprocedure commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

These changes implement a fusion pass in the XNNPACK partitioner to support linear + batchnorm operations. This pass involves identifying and combining each linear node that exclusively precedes a batchnorm node in the Export IR graph. Fusion occurs by updating the linear node's weight and bias with a new fused weight and bias computed from the linear and batchnorm parameters. In the case of linear nodes without bias, the fused bias is added as a new parameter to the linear node. All users of the batchnorm output are then redirected to the fused linear node, and the batchnorm node is removed from the graph.

This linear + batchnorm pass follows the existing implementation pattern of the convolution + batchnorm pass. These fusion passes fold batchnorm into the preceding convolution or linear ops during export. This allows the XNNPACK backend to run a single fused operation at inference, reducing memory usage and latency without affecting model accuracy.

Note: The current linear + batchnorm fusion implementation supports FP32 only. Quantized support is planned for a future PR to TorchAO.

Fixes#11587

Test plan

Tests were added to verify that linear + batchnorm fusion occurs for FP32 models when the linear layer has a single user, and is skipped for linear layers with multiple users. Both linear cases, with and without bias, are tested. A separate test ensures that standalone batchnorm layers are not partitioned, since XNNPACK does not currently support them.

Tests run and passed via:
python -m unittest executorch.backends.xnnpack.test.passes.test_batch_norm_fusion

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11805

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 6c92d24 with merge base a8d7298 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 19, 2025
@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

@pytorch-botpytorch-botBot added the release notes: none Do not include this in the release notes label Jun 19, 2025
Comment threadbackends/xnnpack/_passes/__init__.py Outdated
ConvertToSDPAPass,
ConstPropPass,
FuseBatchNormWithConvPass,
FuseBatchNormWithLinearPass,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome! Do you mind fusing these two passes? Something like BatchNormFusion pass? that way we can just generalize these?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call, combining the two passes cleaned up a lot of the duplication. Let me know if anything else needs to be changed.

@digantdesaidigantdesai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. LGTM. I will let Max stamp it.

@mcr229mcr229 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love this thank you!

@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Awesome, I'm glad!

Should we support fusion for Linear with bias=False as well? I can add it to this PR.

@digantdesai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@keyprocedure let us know once this is good to go. Me or @mcr229 can merge this. Also you might need to rebase, rerun ci.

@keyprocedure
keyprocedureforce-pushed the support-linear-fused-batchnorm branch from 98650e6 to 20afaa8CompareJuly 2, 2025 20:16
@keyprocedure

keyprocedure commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@digantdesai I added support for Linear with bias=False and rebased. Everything is good to go from my end - ready for CI. Thanks for reviewing and following up earlier!

@keyprocedure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

The CI failures look unrelated to this PR. I noticed they were being discussed on Discord as known trunk issues. Just wanted to share in case it's helpful. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to update.

Here's a summary of the failures:

  • test-eval_llama-mmlu-linux: RuntimeError: Dataset scripts are no longer supported, but found mmlu_no_train.py
  • test-arm-cortex-m-size-test (bare_metal): size check failed in cmake-out/test/size_test
  • unittest-release (linux & macos): TensorPtrMakerTest.FailedCreateTensorUsingFromBlobWithIllegalStrides

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunkCLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.release notes: noneDo not include this in the release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Linear Fused Batchnorm

5 participants

@keyprocedure@digantdesai@mcr229@facebook-github-bot@nil-is-all