[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare() - #13497

Merged
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Aug 19, 2025
Merged

[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare()#13497
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

Conversation

@pytorchbot

@pytorchbotpytorchbot commented Aug 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #13478 by @SS-JIA
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge

ssjia
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
8ebea8b
…elines()` to `prepare()`
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
ghstack-source-id: 303779589
Pull Request resolved: #13478
@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Aug 19, 2025•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/13497

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ 8 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit 8ebea8b with merge base 5ff0208 (image):

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@meta-clameta-claBot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Aug 19, 2025
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Aug 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@SS-JIA
SS-JIA merged commit 7622df0 into mainAug 19, 2025
103 of 105 checks passed
@SS-JIA
SS-JIA deleted the gh/SS-JIA/293/orig branch August 19, 2025 03:04
agrima1304 pushed a commit to agrima1304/executorch that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2025
@pytorchbot@agrima1304
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
0d039c9
…elines()` to `prepare()` (pytorch#13497)
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SS-JIASS-JIASS-JIA approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pytorchbot@SS-JIA
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare() - #13497
Merged
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Aug 19, 2025
Merged
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare()#13497
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Conversation
@pytorchbot
@pytorchbotpytorchbot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.

ghstack PR number: #13478 by @SS-JIA

^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews

ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/base

ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/head

Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main

Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

@diff-train-skip-merge
ssjia
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
8ebea8b
…elines()` to `prepare()`
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
ghstack-source-id: 303779589
Pull Request resolved: #13478
@pytorch-bot
pytorch-botBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links
🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/13497
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.
⏳ 8 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure
As of commit 8ebea8b with merge base 5ff0208 (image):
BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:
👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.
@meta-clameta-claBot
added
the 
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
label
Aug 19, 2025
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label
If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.
To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"
For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.
@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
merged commit 7622df0
into
mainAug 19, 2025

103 of 105 checks passed

@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
deleted the

gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

branch
August 19, 2025 03:04
agrima1304 pushed a commit
to agrima1304/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
@pytorchbot@agrima1304
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
0d039c9
…elines()` to `prepare()` (pytorch#13497)
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SS-JIASS-JIASS-JIA approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pytorchbot@SS-JIA

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare() - #13497
Merged
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Aug 19, 2025
Merged
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare()#13497
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Conversation
@pytorchbot
@pytorchbotpytorchbot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.

ghstack PR number: #13478 by @SS-JIA

^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews

ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/base

ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/head

Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main

Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

@diff-train-skip-merge
ssjia
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
8ebea8b
…elines()` to `prepare()`
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
ghstack-source-id: 303779589
Pull Request resolved: #13478
@pytorch-bot
pytorch-botBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links
🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/13497
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.
⏳ 8 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure
As of commit 8ebea8b with merge base 5ff0208 (image):
BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:
👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.
@meta-clameta-claBot
added
the 
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
label
Aug 19, 2025
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label
If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.
To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"
For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.
@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
merged commit 7622df0
into
mainAug 19, 2025

103 of 105 checks passed

@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
deleted the

gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

branch
August 19, 2025 03:04
agrima1304 pushed a commit
to agrima1304/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
@pytorchbot@agrima1304
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
0d039c9
…elines()` to `prepare()` (pytorch#13497)
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SS-JIASS-JIASS-JIA approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pytorchbot@SS-JIA

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare() - #13497
Merged
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Aug 19, 2025
Merged
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare()#13497
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Conversation
@pytorchbot
@pytorchbotpytorchbot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.

ghstack PR number: #13478 by @SS-JIA

^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews

ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/base

ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/head

Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main

Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

@diff-train-skip-merge
ssjia
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
8ebea8b
…elines()` to `prepare()`
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
ghstack-source-id: 303779589
Pull Request resolved: #13478
@pytorch-bot
pytorch-botBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links
🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/13497
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.
⏳ 8 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure
As of commit 8ebea8b with merge base 5ff0208 (image):
BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:
👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.
@meta-clameta-claBot
added
the 
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
label
Aug 19, 2025
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label
If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.
To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"
For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.
@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
merged commit 7622df0
into
mainAug 19, 2025

103 of 105 checks passed

@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
deleted the

gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

branch
August 19, 2025 03:04
agrima1304 pushed a commit
to agrima1304/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
@pytorchbot@agrima1304
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
0d039c9
…elines()` to `prepare()` (pytorch#13497)
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SS-JIASS-JIASS-JIA approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pytorchbot@SS-JIA

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare() - #13497
Merged
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Aug 19, 2025
Merged
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare()#13497
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Conversation
@pytorchbot
@pytorchbotpytorchbot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.

ghstack PR number: #13478 by @SS-JIA

^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews

ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/base

ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/head

Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main

Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

@diff-train-skip-merge
ssjia
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
8ebea8b
…elines()` to `prepare()`
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
ghstack-source-id: 303779589
Pull Request resolved: #13478
@pytorch-bot
pytorch-botBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links
🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/13497
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.
⏳ 8 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure
As of commit 8ebea8b with merge base 5ff0208 (image):
BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:
👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.
@meta-clameta-claBot
added
the 
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
label
Aug 19, 2025
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label
If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.
To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"
For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.
@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
merged commit 7622df0
into
mainAug 19, 2025

103 of 105 checks passed

@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
deleted the

gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

branch
August 19, 2025 03:04
agrima1304 pushed a commit
to agrima1304/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
@pytorchbot@agrima1304
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
0d039c9
…elines()` to `prepare()` (pytorch#13497)
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SS-JIASS-JIASS-JIA approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pytorchbot@SS-JIA

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare() - #13497
Merged
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Aug 19, 2025
Merged
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare()#13497
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Conversation
@pytorchbot
@pytorchbotpytorchbot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.

ghstack PR number: #13478 by @SS-JIA

^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews

ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/base

ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/head

Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main

Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

@diff-train-skip-merge
ssjia
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
8ebea8b
…elines()` to `prepare()`
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
ghstack-source-id: 303779589
Pull Request resolved: #13478
@pytorch-bot
pytorch-botBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links
🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/13497
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.
⏳ 8 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure
As of commit 8ebea8b with merge base 5ff0208 (image):
BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:
👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.
@meta-clameta-claBot
added
the 
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
label
Aug 19, 2025
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label
If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.
To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"
For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.
@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
merged commit 7622df0
into
mainAug 19, 2025

103 of 105 checks passed

@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
deleted the

gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

branch
August 19, 2025 03:04
agrima1304 pushed a commit
to agrima1304/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
@pytorchbot@agrima1304
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
0d039c9
…elines()` to `prepare()` (pytorch#13497)
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SS-JIASS-JIASS-JIA approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pytorchbot@SS-JIA

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare() - #13497
Merged
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Aug 19, 2025
Merged
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare()#13497
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Conversation
@pytorchbot
@pytorchbotpytorchbot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.

ghstack PR number: #13478 by @SS-JIA

^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews

ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/base

ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/head

Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main

Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

@diff-train-skip-merge
ssjia
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
8ebea8b
…elines()` to `prepare()`
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
ghstack-source-id: 303779589
Pull Request resolved: #13478
@pytorch-bot
pytorch-botBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links
🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/13497
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.
⏳ 8 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure
As of commit 8ebea8b with merge base 5ff0208 (image):
BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:
👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.
@meta-clameta-claBot
added
the 
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
label
Aug 19, 2025
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label
If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.
To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"
For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.
@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
merged commit 7622df0
into
mainAug 19, 2025

103 of 105 checks passed

@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
deleted the

gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

branch
August 19, 2025 03:04
agrima1304 pushed a commit
to agrima1304/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
@pytorchbot@agrima1304
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
0d039c9
…elines()` to `prepare()` (pytorch#13497)
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SS-JIASS-JIASS-JIA approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pytorchbot@SS-JIA

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare() - #13497
Merged
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Aug 19, 2025
Merged
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from prepare_pipelines() to prepare()#13497
SS-JIA merged 1 commit into
mainfrom 
gh/SS-JIA/293/orig
Conversation
@pytorchbot
@pytorchbotpytorchbot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.

ghstack PR number: #13478 by @SS-JIA

^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews

ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/base

ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/head

Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main

Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

@diff-train-skip-merge
ssjia
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
8ebea8b
…elines()` to `prepare()`
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
ghstack-source-id: 303779589
Pull Request resolved: #13478
@pytorch-bot
pytorch-botBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links
🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/13497
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.
⏳ 8 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure
As of commit 8ebea8b with merge base 5ff0208 (image):
BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:
👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.
@meta-clameta-claBot
added
the 
CLA Signed
This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
label
Aug 19, 2025
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Aug 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label
If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.
To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"
For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.
@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
merged commit 7622df0
into
mainAug 19, 2025

103 of 105 checks passed

@SS-JIA
SS-JIA
deleted the

gh/SS-JIA/293/orig

branch
August 19, 2025 03:04
agrima1304 pushed a commit
to agrima1304/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2025
@pytorchbot@agrima1304
[ET-VK][ez] Move execute node threshold calculation from `prepare_pip…
0d039c9
…elines()` to `prepare()` (pytorch#13497)
Title says it all; `prepare()` is a more appropriate place for this action than `prepare_pipelines()`.
## Motivation
Fix potential floating point exception (divide-by-zero) during tests.
Some tests don't call `prepare_pipelines()`, which means `execute_threshold_node_count_` is unititialized, causing a divide by zero in execute when trying to modulo with `execute_threshold_node_count_`
Differential Revision: [D80468138](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80468138/)
[ghstack-poisoned]
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@SS-JIASS-JIASS-JIA approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@pytorchbot@SS-JIA