Increase CI timeout - #8173

Merged
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Increase CI timeout#8173
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout

Conversation

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since #7922, 2 CI jobs consistently hit timeout.

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8173

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit dd142f8 with merge base 9441003 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroymetascroy added the module: ci Issues related to continuous integration label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Something is definitely wrong. In the raw logs for the first test-llava-runner-linux timeout on main, there are almost 40 minutes of "gaps" in the logs with no timestamps. Specifically:

  • 14 minute "gap" in logs, jump from 2025-01-31T23:11:50.6702881Z to 2025-01-31T23:25:21.0383351Z, during export.
  • 25 minute "gap in logs from 2025-01-31T23:25:21.2243143Z to 2025-01-31T23:42:40.6914293Z , and the second message is just a job timeout.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tracking issue: #8180

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

It's a good question, but currently this is one of the issues blocking viable/strict from updating and I thought having a short-term "fix" as the investigation continues would be better than nothing.

There are several ways we could fix:

@swolchokswolchok left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unblocking seems good

@metascroy
metascroy merged commit 25707ea into pytorch:mainFeb 4, 2025
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
#8173 raised these timeouts. Now that #8248 has landed to fix#8180, we should be able to lower them again. (I'm sending this early so I don't forget; double-check llava-runner running time)
ghstack-source-id: cb4c169
ghstack-comment-id: 2648474106
Pull Request resolved: #8339
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.module: ciIssues related to continuous integrationtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@metascroy@swolchok@facebook-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Increase CI timeout - #8173

Merged
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Increase CI timeout#8173
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout

Conversation

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since #7922, 2 CI jobs consistently hit timeout.

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8173

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit dd142f8 with merge base 9441003 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroymetascroy added the module: ci Issues related to continuous integration label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Something is definitely wrong. In the raw logs for the first test-llava-runner-linux timeout on main, there are almost 40 minutes of "gaps" in the logs with no timestamps. Specifically:

  • 14 minute "gap" in logs, jump from 2025-01-31T23:11:50.6702881Z to 2025-01-31T23:25:21.0383351Z, during export.
  • 25 minute "gap in logs from 2025-01-31T23:25:21.2243143Z to 2025-01-31T23:42:40.6914293Z , and the second message is just a job timeout.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tracking issue: #8180

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

It's a good question, but currently this is one of the issues blocking viable/strict from updating and I thought having a short-term "fix" as the investigation continues would be better than nothing.

There are several ways we could fix:

@swolchokswolchok left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unblocking seems good

@metascroy
metascroy merged commit 25707ea into pytorch:mainFeb 4, 2025
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
#8173 raised these timeouts. Now that #8248 has landed to fix#8180, we should be able to lower them again. (I'm sending this early so I don't forget; double-check llava-runner running time)
ghstack-source-id: cb4c169
ghstack-comment-id: 2648474106
Pull Request resolved: #8339
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.module: ciIssues related to continuous integrationtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@metascroy@swolchok@facebook-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Increase CI timeout - #8173

Merged
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Increase CI timeout#8173
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout

Conversation

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since #7922, 2 CI jobs consistently hit timeout.

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8173

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit dd142f8 with merge base 9441003 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroymetascroy added the module: ci Issues related to continuous integration label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Something is definitely wrong. In the raw logs for the first test-llava-runner-linux timeout on main, there are almost 40 minutes of "gaps" in the logs with no timestamps. Specifically:

  • 14 minute "gap" in logs, jump from 2025-01-31T23:11:50.6702881Z to 2025-01-31T23:25:21.0383351Z, during export.
  • 25 minute "gap in logs from 2025-01-31T23:25:21.2243143Z to 2025-01-31T23:42:40.6914293Z , and the second message is just a job timeout.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tracking issue: #8180

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

It's a good question, but currently this is one of the issues blocking viable/strict from updating and I thought having a short-term "fix" as the investigation continues would be better than nothing.

There are several ways we could fix:

@swolchokswolchok left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unblocking seems good

@metascroy
metascroy merged commit 25707ea into pytorch:mainFeb 4, 2025
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
#8173 raised these timeouts. Now that #8248 has landed to fix#8180, we should be able to lower them again. (I'm sending this early so I don't forget; double-check llava-runner running time)
ghstack-source-id: cb4c169
ghstack-comment-id: 2648474106
Pull Request resolved: #8339
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.module: ciIssues related to continuous integrationtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@metascroy@swolchok@facebook-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Increase CI timeout - #8173

Merged
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Increase CI timeout#8173
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout

Conversation

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since #7922, 2 CI jobs consistently hit timeout.

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8173

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit dd142f8 with merge base 9441003 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroymetascroy added the module: ci Issues related to continuous integration label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Something is definitely wrong. In the raw logs for the first test-llava-runner-linux timeout on main, there are almost 40 minutes of "gaps" in the logs with no timestamps. Specifically:

  • 14 minute "gap" in logs, jump from 2025-01-31T23:11:50.6702881Z to 2025-01-31T23:25:21.0383351Z, during export.
  • 25 minute "gap in logs from 2025-01-31T23:25:21.2243143Z to 2025-01-31T23:42:40.6914293Z , and the second message is just a job timeout.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tracking issue: #8180

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

It's a good question, but currently this is one of the issues blocking viable/strict from updating and I thought having a short-term "fix" as the investigation continues would be better than nothing.

There are several ways we could fix:

@swolchokswolchok left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unblocking seems good

@metascroy
metascroy merged commit 25707ea into pytorch:mainFeb 4, 2025
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
#8173 raised these timeouts. Now that #8248 has landed to fix#8180, we should be able to lower them again. (I'm sending this early so I don't forget; double-check llava-runner running time)
ghstack-source-id: cb4c169
ghstack-comment-id: 2648474106
Pull Request resolved: #8339
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.module: ciIssues related to continuous integrationtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@metascroy@swolchok@facebook-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Increase CI timeout - #8173

Merged
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Increase CI timeout#8173
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout

Conversation

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since #7922, 2 CI jobs consistently hit timeout.

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8173

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit dd142f8 with merge base 9441003 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroymetascroy added the module: ci Issues related to continuous integration label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Something is definitely wrong. In the raw logs for the first test-llava-runner-linux timeout on main, there are almost 40 minutes of "gaps" in the logs with no timestamps. Specifically:

  • 14 minute "gap" in logs, jump from 2025-01-31T23:11:50.6702881Z to 2025-01-31T23:25:21.0383351Z, during export.
  • 25 minute "gap in logs from 2025-01-31T23:25:21.2243143Z to 2025-01-31T23:42:40.6914293Z , and the second message is just a job timeout.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tracking issue: #8180

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

It's a good question, but currently this is one of the issues blocking viable/strict from updating and I thought having a short-term "fix" as the investigation continues would be better than nothing.

There are several ways we could fix:

@swolchokswolchok left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unblocking seems good

@metascroy
metascroy merged commit 25707ea into pytorch:mainFeb 4, 2025
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
#8173 raised these timeouts. Now that #8248 has landed to fix#8180, we should be able to lower them again. (I'm sending this early so I don't forget; double-check llava-runner running time)
ghstack-source-id: cb4c169
ghstack-comment-id: 2648474106
Pull Request resolved: #8339
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.module: ciIssues related to continuous integrationtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@metascroy@swolchok@facebook-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Increase CI timeout - #8173

Merged
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Increase CI timeout#8173
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout

Conversation

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since #7922, 2 CI jobs consistently hit timeout.

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8173

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit dd142f8 with merge base 9441003 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroymetascroy added the module: ci Issues related to continuous integration label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Something is definitely wrong. In the raw logs for the first test-llava-runner-linux timeout on main, there are almost 40 minutes of "gaps" in the logs with no timestamps. Specifically:

  • 14 minute "gap" in logs, jump from 2025-01-31T23:11:50.6702881Z to 2025-01-31T23:25:21.0383351Z, during export.
  • 25 minute "gap in logs from 2025-01-31T23:25:21.2243143Z to 2025-01-31T23:42:40.6914293Z , and the second message is just a job timeout.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tracking issue: #8180

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

It's a good question, but currently this is one of the issues blocking viable/strict from updating and I thought having a short-term "fix" as the investigation continues would be better than nothing.

There are several ways we could fix:

@swolchokswolchok left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unblocking seems good

@metascroy
metascroy merged commit 25707ea into pytorch:mainFeb 4, 2025
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
#8173 raised these timeouts. Now that #8248 has landed to fix#8180, we should be able to lower them again. (I'm sending this early so I don't forget; double-check llava-runner running time)
ghstack-source-id: cb4c169
ghstack-comment-id: 2648474106
Pull Request resolved: #8339
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.module: ciIssues related to continuous integrationtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@metascroy@swolchok@facebook-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Increase CI timeout - #8173

Merged
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Increase CI timeout#8173
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout

Conversation

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since #7922, 2 CI jobs consistently hit timeout.

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8173

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit dd142f8 with merge base 9441003 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroymetascroy added the module: ci Issues related to continuous integration label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Something is definitely wrong. In the raw logs for the first test-llava-runner-linux timeout on main, there are almost 40 minutes of "gaps" in the logs with no timestamps. Specifically:

  • 14 minute "gap" in logs, jump from 2025-01-31T23:11:50.6702881Z to 2025-01-31T23:25:21.0383351Z, during export.
  • 25 minute "gap in logs from 2025-01-31T23:25:21.2243143Z to 2025-01-31T23:42:40.6914293Z , and the second message is just a job timeout.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tracking issue: #8180

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

It's a good question, but currently this is one of the issues blocking viable/strict from updating and I thought having a short-term "fix" as the investigation continues would be better than nothing.

There are several ways we could fix:

@swolchokswolchok left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unblocking seems good

@metascroy
metascroy merged commit 25707ea into pytorch:mainFeb 4, 2025
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
#8173 raised these timeouts. Now that #8248 has landed to fix#8180, we should be able to lower them again. (I'm sending this early so I don't forget; double-check llava-runner running time)
ghstack-source-id: cb4c169
ghstack-comment-id: 2648474106
Pull Request resolved: #8339
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.module: ciIssues related to continuous integrationtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@metascroy@swolchok@facebook-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Increase CI timeout - #8173

Merged
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Increase CI timeout#8173
metascroy merged 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
metascroy:update-timeout

Conversation

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since #7922, 2 CI jobs consistently hit timeout.

@pytorch-bot

pytorch-botBot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8173

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit dd142f8 with merge base 9441003 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-botfacebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroymetascroy added the module: ci Issues related to continuous integration label Feb 4, 2025
@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Something is definitely wrong. In the raw logs for the first test-llava-runner-linux timeout on main, there are almost 40 minutes of "gaps" in the logs with no timestamps. Specifically:

  • 14 minute "gap" in logs, jump from 2025-01-31T23:11:50.6702881Z to 2025-01-31T23:25:21.0383351Z, during export.
  • 25 minute "gap in logs from 2025-01-31T23:25:21.2243143Z to 2025-01-31T23:42:40.6914293Z , and the second message is just a job timeout.

@swolchok

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tracking issue: #8180

@metascroy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Are people really going to wait this long? I already had no patience with the jobs taking an hour.

I looked into it briefly and I dont know why they would be taking longer; the pinned PyTorch commit is prebuilt at docker container generation time and I’m fairly sure it is in fact a release build.

It's a good question, but currently this is one of the issues blocking viable/strict from updating and I thought having a short-term "fix" as the investigation continues would be better than nothing.

There are several ways we could fix:

@swolchokswolchok left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unblocking seems good

@metascroy
metascroy merged commit 25707ea into pytorch:mainFeb 4, 2025
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
#8173 raised these timeouts. Now that #8248 has landed to fix#8180, we should be able to lower them again. (I'm sending this early so I don't forget; double-check llava-runner running time)
ghstack-source-id: cb4c169
ghstack-comment-id: 2648474106
Pull Request resolved: #8339
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA SignedThis label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.module: ciIssues related to continuous integrationtopic: not user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@metascroy@swolchok@facebook-github-bot