Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove explicit descriptor - #9001
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/9001
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 2 New FailuresAs of commit 48fa78d with merge base e673f7c ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
a990095 to
70a62f2Comparefacebook-github-bot
commented
Mar 6, 2025
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D70630711 |
5 similar comments
facebook-github-bot
commented
Mar 6, 2025
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D70630711 |
facebook-github-bot
commented
Mar 6, 2025
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D70630711 |
facebook-github-bot
commented
Mar 6, 2025
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D70630711 |
facebook-github-bot
commented
Mar 6, 2025
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D70630711 |
facebook-github-bot
commented
Mar 6, 2025
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D70630711 |
harishs88ss
commented
Mar 6, 2025
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing" |
Summary: we only need this for constructors with one param Reviewed By: JacobSzwejbka Differential Revision: D70630711
70a62f2 to
48fa78dComparefacebook-github-bot
commented
Mar 7, 2025
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D70630711 |
3 similar comments
facebook-github-bot
commented
Mar 7, 2025
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D70630711 |
facebook-github-bot
commented
Mar 7, 2025
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D70630711 |
facebook-github-bot
commented
Mar 7, 2025
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D70630711 |
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
2 similar comments
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
Summary: we only need this for constructors with one param
Differential Revision: D70630711