Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Qcom 6.18.y SCMI - #652
Conversation
Merge Check Failed: CR Not Eligible for Merge CR 4559569 is not eligible for merge. The parent software image for kernel.qli.2.0 is not development complete. Entity: Please ensure the CR passes both CCT (ComponentChangeTasks) and ICT (Integration Change Tasks) validations. |
7dbf88f to
959807bCompareqlijarvis
commented
Jun 5, 2026
PR #652 — validate-patchPR:#652
Final Summary
|
qlijarvis
commented
Jun 5, 2026
PR #652 — checker-log-analyzerPR:#652
Detailed report: Full report
|
qcomlnxci
commented
Jun 5, 2026
Test Matrix
|
Salendarsingh Gaud (sgaud-quic)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No Mainline PR in CR
qcomlnxci
commented
Jul 30, 2026
@qualcomm-linux/kernel This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity and will automatically close after an additional 5 days. |
LXQUALCOMM
commented
Jul 30, 2026
Have added Thanks, |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 4, 2026
PR #652 — validate-patchPR:#652
Final Summary
|
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 4, 2026
PR #652 — checker-log-analyzerPR:#652
Detailed report: Full report
|
qcomlnxci
commented
Aug 4, 2026
qcomlnxci
commented
Aug 4, 2026
Test Matrix
|
Salendarsingh Gaud (sgaud-quic)
commented
Aug 11, 2026
LXQUALCOMM you need to rebase PR on tip, merging qcom-6.18.y with PR is not correct |
qcomlnxci
commented
Aug 12, 2026
qcomlnxci
commented
Aug 12, 2026
Test Matrix
|
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
PR #652 — validate-patchPR:#652
Final Summary
|
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
PR #652 — checker-log-analyzerPR:#652
Detailed report: Full report
|
LXQUALCOMM
commented
Aug 12, 2026
I have rebased it |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 Build Status: ✅ SUCCESSFULBoth kernel builds (standard and RT) completed successfully with no compilation errors. Test Status: ❌ FAILED (Infrastructure Issue)All 10 test jobs failed due to LAVA server connectivity timeout:
VerdictNo build errors were introduced by this PR. The workflow failure is due to LAVA test infrastructure connectivity issues, not code problems. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 VerdictNo build failures detected. Both the standard and RT kernel builds completed successfully. The workflow failure was caused by LAVA test job submission timeouts (infrastructure issue), not by compilation errors introduced in this PR. Build Status:
Root Cause: All 10 test jobs failed to submit to 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652
VerdictNo compilation errors found. Both standard and RT kernel builds completed successfully. The workflow failure was caused by a LAVA test infrastructure timeout (HTTPSConnectionPool read timeout connecting to lava-oss.qualcomm.com), which is unrelated to the PR code changes. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qcomlnxci
commented
Aug 12, 2026
qcomlnxci
commented
Aug 12, 2026
Test Matrix
|
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652
VerdictThe kernel builds completed successfully. The workflow failure was caused by LAVA test job submission timeouts (network connectivity issues with lava-oss.qualcomm.com), not by any compilation errors. Both the standard and RT kernel builds passed without errors. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 Build Status: ✅ SUCCESSBoth kernel builds completed successfully:
Workflow Failure ReasonThe workflow was marked as failed due to test job submission failures, not compilation errors.
VerdictNo compilation errors were introduced by this PR. The builds succeeded completely. The workflow failure is due to test infrastructure issues (LAVA job submission), not code problems in the PR. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 Build Status: ✅ SUCCESSFULBoth kernel builds (standard and RT) completed successfully with no compilation errors. Workflow Failure Root CauseThe workflow failed due to infrastructure issues, not code problems:
All 10 test jobs failed to submit due to LAVA server connectivity issues:
VerdictZero compilation errors. The PR changes build cleanly. The workflow failure is caused by external LAVA infrastructure connectivity issues, not by the PR code changes. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652
VerdictNo build errors detected. Both the standard build and RT build completed successfully. The workflow failure was caused by LAVA test infrastructure connectivity issues (connection timeouts to lava-oss.qualcomm.com), not by any code changes in this PR. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 Build Status: ✅ SUCCESSBoth kernel builds completed successfully:
Workflow Failure Root CauseThe workflow failed during the test submission phase, not during compilation. All 9 LAVA test jobs failed to submit due to a connectivity timeout when attempting to reach VerdictZero compilation errors. The workflow failure is an infrastructure/connectivity issue unrelated to the PR changes. The PR successfully builds both standard and RT kernels with no errors or warnings. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 Build Status: ✅ SUCCESSFULNo compilation errors found. Both the standard and RT kernel builds completed successfully. Test Status: ❌ FAILED (Infrastructure Issue)All LAVA test submissions failed due to connection timeout to
VerdictThis PR introduces zero compilation errors. The workflow failure is caused by LAVA server connectivity issues, not by code changes in the PR. The kernel builds cleanly with all PR changes applied. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652
VerdictNo compilation errors detected. Both the standard build and RT build completed successfully. The workflow failure appears to be in a non-build step (likely testing or deployment phase). 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 Build Status: ✅ Build SucceededThe kernel compilation completed successfully with no errors. The workflow failure is not related to compilation errors but appears to be a test infrastructure issue.
VerdictNo compilation errors were introduced by this PR. The build succeeded. The workflow failure is due to missing test artifacts, which indicates a test infrastructure or test execution issue unrelated to the PR's code changes. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 Build Status: ✅ SUCCESSBoth kernel builds (standard and RT) completed successfully with no compilation errors. Workflow Failure Root CauseThe workflow failed during the test submission phase, not during compilation. All 10 LAVA test job submissions failed due to infrastructure issues:
Verdict0 compilation errors. The PR changes introduce no build failures. The workflow failure is caused by LAVA server connectivity issues (lava-oss.qualcomm.com), not by code changes in this PR. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 Build Status: ✅ PASSEDBoth kernel builds (standard and RT) completed successfully with no compilation errors. Test Status: ❌ FAILED (Infrastructure Issue)All 10 LAVA test job submissions failed due to connectivity issues with
VerdictNo build errors were introduced by this PR. The workflow failure is entirely due to LAVA infrastructure connectivity issues, not code problems. The PR changes (devfreq governor header refactoring and SCMI vendor extensions) compiled cleanly for both standard and RT kernel configurations. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 ✅ Build Status: SUCCESSBoth kernel builds completed successfully:
❌ Workflow Status: FAILED (Infrastructure Issue)The workflow failed during LAVA test job submission, not during compilation.
VerdictNo build errors were introduced by this PR. The workflow failure is due to a LAVA infrastructure connectivity timeout (HTTPSConnectionPool read timeout after 20 seconds), not code issues. All kernel compilation completed successfully. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
🔨 Build Failure Analysis — PR #652PR:#652 Build Status: ✅ SUCCESSFULBoth kernel builds (standard and RT) completed successfully with no compilation errors. Workflow Status: ❌ FAILEDThe workflow failed due to LAVA test job submission failures, not build errors.
VerdictNo compilation errors were introduced by this PR. The kernel built successfully. The workflow failure is due to infrastructure issues with LAVA job submission, not code problems in the PR. 📎 Detailed analysis:Full report |
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
PR #652 — validate-patchPR:#652
Final Summary
|
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 12, 2026
PR #652 — checker-log-analyzerPR:#652
Detailed report: Full report
|
Salendarsingh Gaud (sgaud-quic)
commented
Aug 13, 2026
LXQUALCOMM can you please update on the comments on Upstream change ? |
qcomlnxci
commented
Aug 13, 2026
Test Matrix
|
qcomlnxci
commented
Aug 13, 2026
LXQUALCOMM
commented
Aug 14, 2026
Upstream patches with RFC names cannot enter the kernel community in the short term. We only need to ensure that a working version enters first. I have confirmed that the current patch is working |
Salendarsingh Gaud (sgaud-quic)
commented
Aug 20, 2026
LXQUALCOMM please rebase this on tip |
qcomlnxci
commented
Aug 24, 2026
qcomlnxci
commented
Aug 24, 2026
Test Matrix
|
qlijarvis
commented
Aug 25, 2026
LAVA Failed Case Triage SummaryPR: #652 Job 210601 | SoC shikra-iqs-evkLAVA job: https://lava-oss.qualcomm.com/scheduler/job/210601 Failed test cases in LAVA job 210601 (SoC: shikra-iqs-evk).
Job 210602 | SoC qcs8300-rideLAVA job: https://lava-oss.qualcomm.com/scheduler/job/210602 Failed test cases in LAVA job 210602 (SoC: qcs8300-ride).
Job 210603 | SoC lemans-evkLAVA job: https://lava-oss.qualcomm.com/scheduler/job/210603 Failed test cases in LAVA job 210603 (SoC: lemans-evk).
Job 210604 | SoC qcs6490-rb3gen2LAVA job: https://lava-oss.qualcomm.com/scheduler/job/210604 Failed test cases in LAVA job 210604 (SoC: qcs6490-rb3gen2).
Job 210605 | SoC hamoa-evkLAVA job: https://lava-oss.qualcomm.com/scheduler/job/210605 Failed test cases in LAVA job 210605 (SoC: hamoa-evk).
Job 210606 | SoC qcs615-rideLAVA job: https://lava-oss.qualcomm.com/scheduler/job/210606 Failed test cases in LAVA job 210606 (SoC: qcs615-ride).
Job 210607 | SoC qcs9100-rideLAVA job: https://lava-oss.qualcomm.com/scheduler/job/210607 Failed test cases in LAVA job 210607 (SoC: qcs9100-ride).
Job 210608 | SoC purwa-evkLAVA job: https://lava-oss.qualcomm.com/scheduler/job/210608 Failed test cases in LAVA job 210608 (SoC: purwa-evk).
Job 210609 | SoC monaco-evkLAVA job: https://lava-oss.qualcomm.com/scheduler/job/210609 Failed test cases in LAVA job 210609 (SoC: monaco-evk).
|
The application of SCMI patch on Hamoa, as well as some prerequisite code required for applying SCMI driver
CRs-Fixed: 4559569